Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31144
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Y-
dc.contributor.authorGuo, Y-
dc.contributor.authorSun, Y-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, X-
dc.contributor.authorMin, Z-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Q-
dc.contributor.authorChen, S-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Y-
dc.contributor.authorJiang, M-
dc.contributor.authorFeng, A-
dc.contributor.authorKang, S-
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-04T20:13:30Z-
dc.date.available2025-05-04T20:13:30Z-
dc.date.issued2025-05-03-
dc.identifierORCiD: Xiangming Zhou https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7977-0718-
dc.identifiere04720-
dc.identifier.citationZhao, Y. et al. (2025) 'Mechanical and microstructural properties of glass powder-modified recycled brick-concrete aggregate concrete', Case Studies in Construction Materials, 22, e04720, pp. 1 - 24. doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04720.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31144-
dc.descriptionData availability: Data will be made available on request.en_US
dc.description.abstractIn order to achieve a better recycling of construction waste and explore the mechanical properties of concrete after incorporating multiple types of construction waste, this paper uses discarded concrete as recycled concrete aggregate (RCA), waste clay bricks as recycled fine brick aggregate (RFBA), and waste glass powder (GP) as an auxiliary cementitious material. Taking fully into account the modification effect of GP on the mortar matrix, a new type of green recycled concrete, namely GP modified Recycled Brick-Concrete Aggregate Concrete (GBCC), is prepared. Through a four-factor, four-level orthogonal experimental design combined with microstructural analyses (XRD, SEM, EDS, MIP), the mechanical properties and synergistic mechanisms of GBCC were systematically investigated. Results demonstrate that under the optimal mix ratio (15 % RCA, 40 % RFBA, 10 % GP, and water-binder ratio of 0.48), the 28-day cube compressive strength of GBCC reaches 39.2 MPa (equivalent to 100 % of C30 concrete), while the axial compressive strength and splitting tensile strength are 29.8 MPa and 2.72 MPa, respectively, meeting the design requirements of C30 concrete. Notably, at 40 % RFBA replacement, GBCC achieves over 90 % of the compressive strength of conventional C30 concrete. Microscopic analysis indicated that C-(A)-S-H gels formed by GP and RFBA reduced the total porosity by approximately 18 % (MIP test) and increased the proportion of harmless pores (<20 nm) to 25∼28 %, effectively refining the pore structure. SEM-EDS observations revealed dense gel filling at the interfacial transition zone, with the Ca/Si ratio of the gel reduced to 0.29, significantly enhancing interfacial bonding. This study pioneers the efficient co-utilization of RCA, RFBA, and GP, and for the first time integrates SEM-EDS microstructural characterization with molecular chemical analysis to elucidate the formation mechanisms of gels.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by the International Science and Technology Cooperation Project of Henan Province (241111521200), the Advantageous Discipline Strength Enhancement Program of Zhongyuan University of Technology (GG202419), and the Open Fund of Henan Provincial Engineering Research Center for Low-Carbon Technology of Efficient Utilization of New Energy (JDDT2024–005). The authors gratefully acknowledge these supports.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 24-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectrecycled coarse aggregate (RCA)en_US
dc.subjectrecycled fine brick aggregate (RFBA)en_US
dc.subjectglass powder (GP)en_US
dc.subjectorthogonal testen_US
dc.subjectmechanical propertiesen_US
dc.subjectmicroscopic mechanismen_US
dc.titleMechanical and microstructural properties of glass powder-modified recycled brick-concrete aggregate concreteen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2025-04-29-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04720-
dc.relation.isPartOfCase Studies in Construction Materials-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume22-
dc.identifier.eissn2214-5095-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2025-04-29-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ).19.17 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons