Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31546
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSalimian, A-
dc.contributor.authorWatfa, M-
dc.contributor.authorGrung, R-
dc.contributor.authorAnguilano, L-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-13T14:48:21Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-13T14:48:21Z-
dc.date.issued2025-07-05-
dc.identifierORCiD: Ali Salimian https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7889-8285-
dc.identifierORCiD: Megan Watfa https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5797-0643-
dc.identifierORCiD: Lorna Anguilano https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3426-4157-
dc.identifierArticle number: 100263-
dc.identifier.citationSalimian, A. et al. (2025) 'Assessing Data Reliability for AI-Driven Volcanic Rock Dating: A Comparison of Electron Microprobe and Laser Ablation Mass Spectroscopy', Applied Computing and Geosciences, 27, 100263, pp. 1 - 17. doi: 10.1016/j.acags.2025.100263.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31546-
dc.descriptionData and code availability section: The dataset used in this study, including Electron Microprobe and Laser Ablation Mass Spectroscopy results for volcanic rock dating, is available at Zenodo with DOI (10.5281/zenodo.1493329) under the CC-BY 4.0 license. The Python scripts and Jupiter Notebooks used for data preprocessing, AI model training, and figure generation are available at GitHub and archived in Zenodo with DOI (10.5281/zenodo.14933482. All datasets and software are shared under the MIT License, ensuring unrestricted access. Further methodological details, including data processing steps and AI model implementation, are provided in the Methods section.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study explores the integrationof artificial intelligence (AI) and modern data analytics for accurately predicting and classifying three distinct periods of volcanic activity. By leveraging previously dated volcanic samples, we assess whether existing age and geochemical data can reliably group and predict volcanic episodes. Our study focuses on the Kula Volcanic Province (Turkey). We compare the effectiveness of two analytical techniques—Electron Microprobe Analysis (EPMA) and Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS)—in producing high-quality datasets for training deep learning models. While EPMA provides major and minor elemental compositions, LA-ICP-MS offers a broader range of trace elements, which may improve classification accuracy. Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the feasibility of AI-based volcanic rock age estimation. In the first experiment, an autoencoder and unsupervised clustering were applied to reduce dimensionality and group samples based on their elemental composition. The results revealed that EPMA data lacked sufficient detail to form well-defined clusters, whereas LA-ICP-MS data produced clusters that closely aligned with true age classes due to their higher sensitivity to trace elements. In the second experiment, a deep neural network (DNN) was trained to classify rock ages. The LA-ICP-MS-based model achieved a classification accuracy of 95 %, significantly outperforming the EPMA-based model (72 %). These findings underscore the importance of data quality and analytical technique selection in AI-powered geochronology, demonstrating that high-quality trace element data enhances AI model performance for volcanic rock age estimation.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipQuaternary Research Association, and the Mineralogical Society for their financial support.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 17-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectAI-driven geochronologyen_US
dc.subjectvolcanic rock datingen_US
dc.subjectelectron microprobe analysis (EPMA)en_US
dc.subjectlaser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS)en_US
dc.subjectmachine learningen_US
dc.subjecttrace element analysisen_US
dc.titleAssessing Data Reliability for AI-Driven Volcanic Rock Dating: A Comparison of Electron Microprobe and Laser Ablation Mass Spectroscopyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2025-06-30-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.acags.2025.100263-
dc.relation.isPartOfApplied Computing and Geosciences-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume27-
dc.identifier.eissn2590-1974-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2025-06-30-
dc.rights.holderThe Authors-
Appears in Collections:The Experimental Techniques Centre

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ).19.34 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons