Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31767
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPickering, SD-
dc.contributor.authorHansen, ME-
dc.contributor.authorIwasaki, M-
dc.contributor.authorMasita, G-
dc.contributor.authorSunahara, Y-
dc.contributor.authorRoskam, A-
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-19T09:20:02Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-19T09:20:02Z-
dc.date.issued2025-07-31-
dc.identifierORCiD: Steve Pickering https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1357-2994-
dc.identifierORCiD: Martin Ejnar Hansen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3637-208X-
dc.identifierArticle number: 105650-
dc.identifier.citationPickering, S.D. et al. (2025) 'Who eats seaweed? Barriers and motivations in Japan versus the United Kingdom', Food Quality and Preference, 133, 105650, pp. 1 - 8. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105650.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0950-3293-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31767-
dc.descriptionData availability: Full replication data, code and bilingual (English and Japanese) versions of the survey questions are available from the Harvard Dataverse, at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/LXCCIG.en_US
dc.description.abstractSeaweed is widely recognised as a nutritious and sustainable food, yet its adoption varies markedly across cultures. This paper examines consumer acceptance of seaweed in the United Kingdom and Japan using national survey data. Japan offers a context with a long-standing tradition of seaweed consumption, while the UK represents a country where seaweed remains largely unfamiliar in everyday diets. By comparing these contrasting cases, we identify how social, cultural and psychological factors shape attitudes toward this environmentally and nutritionally beneficial food. We explore four dimensions of seaweed perception: current consumption, ease of access, willingness to eat it in future and perceived health benefits. The results reveal strong cross-cultural differences, with education, political orientation, and trust in institutions emerging as key predictors, but with distinct patterns across countries. In the UK, consumption is higher among ethnic minorities and the university-educated, while in Japan, it is more common among women and those on the political right. Although pro-environmental attitudes are often assumed to drive seaweed uptake, our findings suggest that behavioural change is shaped by a broader set of factors. By comparing two culturally distinct markets, the study offers insights that may inform efforts to promote sustainable eating practices in other regions.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research is funded by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS, grant reference JPJSJRP 20211704) and the UK Research and Innovation's Economic and Social Research Council (UKRI-ESRC, grant reference ES/W011913/1).en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 8-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectseaweed consumptionen_US
dc.subjectcross-cultural food attitudesen_US
dc.subjectsustainable fooden_US
dc.subjectfood neophobiaen_US
dc.subjectinstitutional trusten_US
dc.subjectrisk-takingen_US
dc.titleWho eats seaweed? Barriers and motivations in Japan versus the United Kingdomen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2025-07-28-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105650-
dc.relation.isPartOfFood Quality and Preference-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume133-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-6343-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2025-07-28-
dc.rights.holderThe Authors-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Social and Political Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).2.43 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons