Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31928
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Y-
dc.contributor.authorLi, G-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Z-
dc.contributor.authorJia, J-
dc.contributor.authorLi, X-
dc.contributor.authorPeng, D-
dc.coverage.spatialHangzhou, China-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-05T11:25:31Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-08-
dc.date.available2025-09-05T11:25:31Z-
dc.date.issued2025-06-08-
dc.identifierORCiD: Zhengwen Huang https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2426-242X-
dc.identifier.citationZhang, Y. et al. (2025) 'A Multi-Objective Genetic Programming with Size Diversity for Symbolic Regression Problem', 2025 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation CEC 2025, Hangzhou, China, 8-12 June, pp. 1 - 4. doi: 10.1109/CEC65147.2025.11042993.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn979-8-3315-3431-8 (ebk)-
dc.identifier.issn979-8-3315-3432-5 (PoD)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/31928-
dc.description.abstractGenetic programming has been positioned as a fit-for-purpose approach for symbolic regression. Researchers tend to select algorithms that produce a model with low complexity and high accuracy. Multi-objective genetic programming (MOGP) is a promising approach for finding appropriate models by considering tradeoffs between accuracy and complexity. The MOGP has gained significant attention for non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II). However, NSGA-II tends to excessively select individuals of lower complexity, making NSGA-II inefficient in real world applications. SD can be a strategy to promote the evolutionary process by adapting selection pressures for individuals of various size. It deals with the excessive tendency to select low complexity individuals in NSGA-II.We also introduce a practical industrial case of defect detection for dispensing machines. By modeling the dispensing volume of the fluid dispensing systems, defects in the dispensing machine can be detected under different external environmental factors.For the validation of SD, other MOGP algorithms are compared with the improved NSGA-II algorithm, NSGA-II with SD. By comparing multi-objective optimization methods tested on seven general datasets and an industrial case about defect prediction, the experimental results show that performance of the proposed approach is superior or same to other models in terms of accuracy. In terms of complexity, performance of the proposed approach is satisfactory.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship10.13039/501100001809-National Natural Science Foundation of China.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 4-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2025 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works ( https://journals.ieeeauthorcenter.ieee.org/become-an-ieee-journal-author/publishing-ethics/guidelines-and-policies/post-publication-policies/ ).-
dc.rights.urihttps://journals.ieeeauthorcenter.ieee.org/become-an-ieee-journal-author/publishing-ethics/guidelines-and-policies/post-publication-policies/-
dc.source2025 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE CEC 2025)-
dc.source2025 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE CEC 2025)-
dc.subjectgenetic programmingen_US
dc.subjectsymbolic regressionen_US
dc.subjectmulti-objectiveen_US
dc.subjectnon-dominated sortingen_US
dc.subjectfluid dispensing systemsen_US
dc.titleA Multi-Objective Genetic Programming with Size Diversity for Symbolic Regression Problemen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1109/CEC65147.2025.11042993-
dc.relation.isPartOf2025 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation CEC 2025-
pubs.finish-date2025-06-12-
pubs.finish-date2025-06-12-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.start-date2025-06-08-
pubs.start-date2025-06-08-
dc.rights.holderInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Electronic and Electrical Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2025 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works ( https://journals.ieeeauthorcenter.ieee.org/become-an-ieee-journal-author/publishing-ethics/guidelines-and-policies/post-publication-policies/ ).663.52 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.