Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32066
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPickering, SD-
dc.contributor.authorHansen, ME-
dc.contributor.authorDorussen, H-
dc.contributor.authorReifler, J-
dc.contributor.authorScotto, T-
dc.contributor.authorSunahara, Y-
dc.contributor.authorYen, D-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-29T09:29:30Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-29T09:29:30Z-
dc.date.issued2025-11-16-
dc.identifierORCiD: Steve Pickering https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1357-2994-
dc.identifierORCiD: Martin Ejnar Hansen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3637-208X-
dc.identifierORCiD: Han Dorussen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3458-0555-
dc.identifierORCiD: Jason Reifler https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1116-7346-
dc.identifierORCiD: Thomas J. Scotto https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4801-6821-
dc.identifierORCiD: Yosuke Sunahara https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0759-1478-
dc.identifierORCiD: Dorothy Yen https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1129-9653-
dc.identifier.citationPickering, S.D. et al. (2025) 'Trust in scientists and doctors: The roles of faith, politics, education and gender', Public Understanding of Science, 0 (ahead of print), pp. 1 - 15. doi: 10.1177/09636625251386562.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0963-6625-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32066-
dc.descriptionData availability statement: Code and replication data are available from the Harvard Dataverse, at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/Z7A1GC .en_US
dc.descriptionSupplementary Material is available online at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09636625251386562#supplementary-materials .-
dc.description.abstractThis article examines trust in science in England, focusing on variation across demographic and ideological groups. Using survey data from 11,173 respondents, we compare trust in two domains, medical doctors and scientists, to explore whether predictors operate similarly across these professional groups. We find higher education is associated with greater trust, while right-wing political orientation predicts lower trust. Religious affiliation also matters, with some faith groups reporting lower trust relative to the non-religious baseline. Gender differences emerge as well, particularly in trust in medical doctors. Respondents selecting ‘Prefer not to say’ on the religion item report significantly lower trust in both doctors and scientists, consistent with a broader privacy-motivated disclosure style. Our results highlight the importance of considering not just overall levels of trust in science, but variation across education, ideology, religion and gender, and they suggest that trust in doctors and trust in scientists, while related, are not interchangeable.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This project is sponsored by the UK Research and Innovation’s Economic and Social Research Council (UKRI-ESRC, grant reference ES/W011913/1) and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS, grant reference JPJSJRP 20211704).en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 15-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjecttrust in scienceen_US
dc.subjectscientistsen_US
dc.subjectmedical doctorsen_US
dc.subjecttrusten_US
dc.subjectreligionen_US
dc.subjectethnicityen_US
dc.subjecteducationen_US
dc.subjectideologyen_US
dc.titleTrust in scientists and doctors: The roles of faith, politics, education and genderen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2025-09-24-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/09636625251386562-
dc.relation.isPartOfPublic Understanding of Science-
pubs.issue0-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume00-
dc.identifier.eissn1361-6609-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2025-09-24-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2025. Rights and permissions: Creative Commons License (CC BY 4.0). This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).490.72 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons