Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32194
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFinancial Markets Law Committee Advisory Group-
dc.contributor.authorPerkins, J-
dc.contributor.authorReisberg, A-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-20T14:20:54Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-20T14:20:54Z-
dc.date.issued2018-03-18-
dc.identifierORCiD: Arad Reisberg https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4902-4105-
dc.identifier.citationFinancial Markets Law Committee Advisory Group (2018) Letter to MoJ on the Brexit Withdrawal Bill, 18 Marchen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32194-
dc.descriptionFor context, see Joe Buchanunn's related news story, 'Ill-defined legal terms likely to cause post-Brexit problems, advisory group cautions', of 22 March 2018 at https://www.brunel.ac.uk/news-and-events/news/articles/Ill-defined-legal-terms-likely-to-cause-post-Brexit-problems-advisory-group-cautions. "The letter details the concerns and advice of the Financial Markets Law Committee (FMLC)’s Advisory Group on Brexit, whose Working Group has worked for the last three months to discuss problems related to a lack of precision in EU legal terminology – all of which, come Brexit, is set to be incorporated into domestic law as a result of the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill."en_US
dc.description.abstractOn the recommendation of members of the FMLC’s Advisory Group on Brexit, the FMLC wrote to the Ministry of Justice to draw attention to potential legal uncertainties arising from provisions in the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill (the “Withdrawal Bill”), which will, post-Brexit, govern the interpretation by U.K. courts of E.U. concepts. According to the Withdrawal Bill, where the meaning of an autonomous E.U. term or concept is defined before exit day, U.K. judges will follow that interpretation. The FMLC notes, however, that where the meaning of terms is not fixed by exit day—or their interpretation is discussed and adjudicated upon by the ECJ post-Brexit—there remains ambiguity as to how U.K. courts should proceed. The FMLC also offers a potential solution by which this may be resolved.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 4-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFinancial Markets Law Committeeen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://www.brunel.ac.uk/news-and-events/news/articles/Ill-defined-legal-terms-likely-to-cause-post-Brexit-problems-advisory-group-cautions-
dc.titleLetter to Ministry of Justice: Clause 6 of the Withdrawal Bill: 19 March 2018en_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
dc.relation.isPartOfLetter to MoJ on the Brexit Withdrawal Bill-
pubs.commissioning-bodyThe Financial Markets Law Committee ("the FMLC")-
pubs.commissioning-bodyThe Financial Markets Law Committee ("the FMLC")-
pubs.confidentialfalse-
pubs.confidentialfalse-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Law School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf1.81 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.