Brunel University Research Archive(BURA) preserves and enables easy and open access to all
types of digital content. It showcases Brunel's research outputs.
Research contained within BURA is open access, although some publications may be subject
to publisher imposed embargoes. All awarded PhD theses are also archived on BURA.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32502Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Bosher, H | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-16T12:29:07Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-12-16T12:29:07Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-12-01 | - |
| dc.identifier | ORCiD: Hayleigh Bosher https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4771-7469 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Bosher, H. (2025) 'Two AI copyright cases, two very different outcomes – here’s why', The Conversation, 1 December, pp. 1 - 3. doi: 10.64628/AB.wreajhqdf. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32502 | - |
| dc.description | This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original at https://theconversation.com/two-ai-copyright-cases-two-very-different-outcomes-heres-why-270229 . | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Artificial intelligence companies and the creative industries are locked in an ongoing battle, being played out in the courts. The thread that pulls all these lawsuits together is copyright. | en_US |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Brunel University of London provides funding as a member of The Conversation UK. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 1 - 3 | - |
| dc.format.medium | Electronic | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Conversation Trust (UK) Ltd | en_US |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | - |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ | - |
| dc.source.uri | https://theconversation.com/two-ai-copyright-cases-two-very-different-outcomes-heres-why-270229 | - |
| dc.subject | artificial intelligence (AI) | en_US |
| dc.title | Two AI copyright cases, two very different outcomes – here’s why | en_US |
| dc.type | Other | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.64628/AB.wreajhqdf | - |
| dc.rights.license | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/legalcode.en | - |
| dc.rights.holder | The Author(s) / Image rights: banner image: Feng Yu; Stable Diffusion is an AI art generator developed by Stability AI. Olivia_Brown | - |
| dc.contributor.orcid | Hayleigh Bosher [0000-0002-4771-7469] | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Brunel Law School Research Papers | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FullText.pdf | Copyright © 2025 The Author(s) / Image rights: banner image: Feng Yu; Stable Diffusion is an AI art generator developed by Stability AI. Olivia_Brown. The text of this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/). | 7.04 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
