Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32994
Title: Spatial–Temporal Deep Learning for Electric-Vehicle Charging Demand: An Exploratory Study of Graph Convolutional and LSTM Networks Performance
Authors: Alaraj, M
Martins, C
Radi, M
Darwish, M
Majdalawieh, M
Keywords: electric vehicle charging;energy consumption forecasting;graph convolutional networks (GCN);long short-term memory (LSTM);smart grid management;spatio-temporal deep learning
Issue Date: 24-Nov-2025
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Citation: Alaraj, M. et al. (2025) 'Spatial–Temporal Deep Learning for Electric-Vehicle Charging Demand: An Exploratory Study of Graph Convolutional and LSTM Networks Performance', IEEE Access, 13, pp. 202203 - 202213. doi: 10.1109/access.2025.3636433.
Abstract: Electric-vehicle (EV) charging is a localized, time-varying load that challenges distribution networks. This study offers practical insights into when spatial graph structure adds value beyond temporal context, utilizing real-world data and a transparent evaluation. We compare Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) models for hourly EV-charging energy forecasting, based on 145,778 sessions recorded in Boulder, Colorado (2018–2023). After preprocessing and temporal alignment, temporal covariates (hour, day, month, year) and, when applicable, ZIP-code indicators were engineered. LSTMs were trained with 1 h and 24 h input windows, with or without ZIP features, and evaluated through 5-fold cross-validation. GCNs operated on hourly node–time tensors with a dense adjacency (no self-loops) and were trained on an 80/20 temporal split, using a 1% subsample for tractability. All models used Adam (lr = 0.005), early stopping, and ReduceLROnPlateau. Temporal context was the main driver of LSTM accuracy: 24 h inputs outperformed 1 h, while ZIP features improved only the shorter window. For GCNs, depth and node features shaped performance: a 2-layer GCN with ZIP features achieved the lowest RMSE (4.75 kWh), whereas a 6-layer GCN without node features reached the lowest MAE (2.46 kWh). Despite higher computational cost, GCNs captured spatial coupling effectively. Overall, 24 h LSTMs provide a strong and efficient baseline, while GCNs add value when spatial correlations are relevant. A hybrid GCN–LSTM architecture is a promising next step to jointly leverage spatial and temporal dependencies.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/32994
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3636433
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: Maher Alaraj https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9315-0670
ORCiD: Mohamed Darwish https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9495-861X
ORCiD: Munir Majdalawieh https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2559-7371
Appears in Collections:Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2025 The Authors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/9.18 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons