Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33242
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPickering, S-
dc.contributor.authorHansen, ME-
dc.contributor.authorSunahara, Y-
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-07T14:12:49Z-
dc.date.available2026-05-07T14:12:49Z-
dc.date.issued2026-05-19-
dc.identifierORCiD: Steve Pickering https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1357-2994-
dc.identifierORCiD: Martin Ejnar Hansen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3637-208X-
dc.identifierORCiD: Yosuke Sunahara https://orcid.org/0009-00010759-1478-
dc.identifier.citationPickering, S., Hansen, M.E. and Sunahara, Y. (2026) 'Support for AI in Public Administration: A Comparative Study of the United Kingdom and Japan', International Journal of Public Administration, 0 (accepted, in press), pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2026.2667201.en-US
dc.identifier.issn0190-0692-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33242-
dc.descriptionReplication data: Full anonymized replication data and code are available from the Harvard Dataverse, at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AWHYKA .en-US
dc.description.abstractAs public administrations increasingly adopt AI, understanding citizens’ attitudes toward algorithmic decision-making has become important for maintaining legitimacy and public trust. We find that citizens in both the UK and Japan are relatively open to AI handling routine administrative functions, but support declines when AI is associated with more complex or discretionary decisions. Individuals who perceive AI as beneficial and who report higher levels of digital self-efficacy are significantly more supportive of AI in public administration, while fear of AI reduces support. Trust in government consistently predicts acceptance of administrative AI, whereas generalized social trust plays a weaker role. Japan shows higher baseline support but also heightened caution, while attitudes in the UK are more ideologically divided. Public acceptance of AI in government depends not only on institutional trust but also on broader social perceptions of the technology and the perceived complexity of the tasks it performs.en-US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded by the UKRI/ESRC [grant number ES/W011913/1] and the JSPS [grant number JPJSJRP 20211704].en-US
dc.format.extentpp. 1–13-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglishen-US
dc.language.isoengen-US
dc.publisherRoutledge (Taylor and Francis Group)en-US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AWHYKA-
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectAIen-US
dc.subjectpublic administrationen-US
dc.subjectUKen-US
dc.subjectJapanen-US
dc.subjecttrust-
dc.titleSupport for AI in Public Administration: A Comparative Study of the United Kingdom and Japanen-US
dc.typeArticleen-US
dc.date.dateAccepted2026-04-27-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2026.2667201-
dc.relation.isPartOfInternational Journal of Public Administration-
pubs.issue0-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume00-
dc.identifier.eissn1532-4265-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2026-04-27-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
dc.contributor.orcidPickering, Steve [0000-0002-1357-2994]-
dc.contributor.orcidHansen, Martin Ejnar [0000-0002-3637-208X]-
dc.contributor.orcidSunahara, Yosuke [0009-00010759-1478]-
Appears in Collections:Department of Strategy, Entrepreneurship and Management Research Papers *
Department of Social and Political Sciences Research Papers *

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.1.26 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons