Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33332Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Mthembu, S | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Özbilgin, MF | - |
| dc.contributor.author | April, K | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Erbil, C | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-05-22T11:37:23Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-05-22T11:37:23Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-05-20 | - |
| dc.identifier | ORCiD: Mustafa F. Özbilgin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8672-9534 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Mthembu, S. et al. (2026) 'Relatability as a Racialised Construct in Corporate Graduate Recruitment: Revealing a Hidden Mechanism of Labour Market Exclusion for Black African Youth in South Africa', British Journal of Sociology, 0 (ahead of print), pp. 1–17. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.70128. | en-GB |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0007-1315 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33332 | - |
| dc.description | Data Availability Statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. | en-GB |
| dc.description.abstract | In corporate graduate recruitment worldwide, candidates are often assessed not only on competence but on whether they are deemed relatable. This study theorises relatability as a racialised cultural–affective filter that covertly sustains inequality. Drawing on qualitative interviews, we identify five interlinked processes of self-presentation, confidence, bias, choice, and affinity, through which whiteness operates as a normative anchor in hiring. We extend theories of social closure into aesthetic and affective domains, conceptualising relatability as a meso-level mechanism linking micro-interactional judgements to macro-level racial hierarchies. This framework offers a transferable analytic lens for understanding how cultural capital is operationalised in exclusionary ways across contexts, even in formally and supposedly deracialised systems. The findings call for demand-side reforms that reconfigure organisational norms, broaden definitions of professionalism, and reduce reliance on cultural familiarity as a proxy for merit. Relatability operates as an institutionalised mechanism through which classed and racialised dispositions are recognised and reproduced, even within racially diverse hiring structures. | en-GB |
| dc.format.extent | pp. 1–17 | - |
| dc.format.medium | Print-Electronic | - |
| dc.language | English | en-GB |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en-GB |
| dc.publisher | Wiley on behalf of London School of Economics and Political Science | en-GB |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International | - |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | - |
| dc.subject | critical race theory | en-GB |
| dc.subject | employer decision-making | en-GB |
| dc.subject | labour market inequality | en-GB |
| dc.subject | racialised employability | en-GB |
| dc.subject | relatability | en-GB |
| dc.subject | social closure | en-GB |
| dc.subject | youth unemployment | en-GB |
| dc.title | Relatability as a Racialised Construct in Corporate Graduate Recruitment: Revealing a Hidden Mechanism of Labour Market Exclusion for Black African Youth in South Africa | en-GB |
| dc.type | Article | en-GB |
| dc.date.dateAccepted | 2026-05-10 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.70128 | - |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | British Journal of Sociology | en-GB |
| pubs.issue | 0 | - |
| pubs.publication-status | Published online | - |
| pubs.volume | 00 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1468-4446 | - |
| dc.rights.license | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en | - |
| dcterms.dateAccepted | 2026-05-10 | - |
| dc.rights.holder | The Author(s) | - |
| dc.contributor.orcid | Özbilgin, Mustafa F. [0000-0002-8672-9534] | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Department of Strategy, Entrepreneurship and Management Research Papers * | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FullText.pdf | Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). The British Journal of Sociology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of London School of Economics and Political Science. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | 490.32 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License