Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33440
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorDornan, I-
dc.contributor.advisorFolly, M-
dc.contributor.authorMaib, Nicole-
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-16T15:09:41Z-
dc.date.available2026-06-16T15:09:41Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33440-
dc.descriptionThis thesis was submitted for the award of Doctor of Philosophy and was awarded by Brunel University Londonen_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis analyses the British parliamentary debates in the House of Commons and House of Lords from the years 1765-1776 and the private correspondence of select MPs and Peers to explain and discuss the arguments presented in Parliament during the course of the conflict between Britain and the American colonies which culminated in the Declaration of Independence on 4 July 1776. When viewed from the perspective of the parliamentary debates, MPs and Peers consistently based their decisions regarding the conflict on past precedents established within the realm of Great Britain and Ireland, thus the countries of Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. Parliamentarians used these precedents to argue for the case of principle (whether it was right to act) or practice (whether it was wise to do so) on the proposed measures, whether that be conciliatory or coercive. More significantly, Parliamentarians became increasingly concerned about how their responses and actions towards the American colonies could alter the terms of Parliament’s sovereignty and its relations and authority over nations throughout its realm, most especially with Ireland and Scotland. There was real potential for the British American conflict to inspire and provoke similar rebellious movements for independence in other parts of the British realm, most particularly in Ireland. This thesis concludes that Parliament’s steadfast reliance on and concern to uphold historic policy precedents set with Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, became a key strategy for managing the evolving political crisis with the American colonies during this period. This approach, however, failed to consider the American colonies’ unique status within the realm. In turn, this clouded and impeded Parliament’s decision-making process because, to Parliament, it was not purely a case of maintaining its authority and sovereignty over the American colonies, but also over those nations much closer to home, namely Ireland, Scotland, and Wales.en_US
dc.publisherBrunel University Londonen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33440/1/FulltextThesis.pdf-
dc.subjectBritish perspective on the American Revolutionen_US
dc.subject18th century politicsen_US
dc.subjectBritish and American colonial relationsen_US
dc.subjectTaxation and representation in colonial Americaen_US
dc.subject17 45 Scottish Rebellionen_US
dc.titlePrecedent, principle, and practice: The role of Ireland, Scotland, and Wales in the parliamentary debates on the American Revolution, 1765-1776en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Politics and International Relations
Dept of Social and Political Sciences Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FulltextThesis.pdf1.25 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.