Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33588
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLertnimanoradee, M-
dc.contributor.authorLam, B-
dc.contributor.authorPei, E-
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-17T09:00:47Z-
dc.date.available2026-07-17T09:00:47Z-
dc.date.issued2026-07-14-
dc.identifierORCiD: Busayawan Lam https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0044-1303-
dc.identifierORCiD: Eujin Pei https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3628-8689-
dc.identifier.citationLertnimanoradee, M., Lam, B. and Pei, E. (2026) 'The value of participatory co-design: a case study of upcycling in rural Thailand', CoDesign, 0 (ahead of print), pp. 1–25. doi: 10.1080/15710882.2026.2695794.en-GB
dc.identifier.issn1571-0882-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33588-
dc.description.abstractParticipatory design (PD) has been increasingly applied to support community-based sustainability initiatives, particularly in rural contexts where local knowledge and material constraints shape upcycling practices. However, limited access to design expertise may affect the long-term viability of such initiatives. This study explores how PD principles intersect with upcycling practices in small communities in Thailand through semi-structured interviews with 22 experts from two groups: community-participation experts and upcycling-design experts. An inductive reflexive thematic analysis identified five themes related to participatory upcycling practices, including creative participation as a pathway to community engagement, culturally appropriate communication for sustaining involvement, the integration of local craftsmanship into product development, the influence of material availability on design feasibility, and limited access to technical skills. The findings suggest that participatory upcycling practices support locally grounded innovation through collaborative knowledge-sharing and culturally relevant design processes. However, their implementation remains dependent on external technical support and resource access in rural contexts. The study highlights the importance of context-sensitive design collaboration in supporting sustainable community-based upcycling practices.en-GB
dc.format.extentpp. 1–25-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglishen-GB
dc.language.isoengen-GB
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen-GB
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/-
dc.subjectparticipatory designen-GB
dc.subjectupcyclingen-GB
dc.subjectmunicipal solid wasteen-GB
dc.subjectcommunity engagementen-GB
dc.subjectlocal craftsen-GB
dc.titleThe value of participatory co-design: a case study of upcycling in rural Thailanden-GB
dc.typeArticleen-GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2026.2695794-
dc.relation.isPartOfCoDesignen-GB
pubs.issue0-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume00-
dc.identifier.eissn1745-3755-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.en-
dc.rights.holderTaylor & Francis-
dc.contributor.orcidLam, Busayawan [0000-0002-0044-1303]-
dc.contributor.orcidPei, Eujin [0000-0002-3628-8689]-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Design School Embargoed Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2026 Taylor & Francis. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in CoDesign, on 14 Jul 2026, available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/15710882.2026.2695794 (see: https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/research-impact/sharing-versions-of-journal-articles/).1.19 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons