Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33656
Title: Protein digestibility and iron bioaccessibility of plant-based meat analogues
Authors: Lubaale, J
McClure, DD
Kanyuck, KM
Sulaiman, NL
Zhang, W
Stojceska, V
Keywords: plant-based meat alternative;digestibility;protein;iron;extrusion
Issue Date: 19-Jul-2026
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Lubaale, J. et al. (2026) 'Protein digestibility and iron bioaccessibility of plant-based meat analogues', Food Chemistry, 0 (in press, pre-proof), 150487, pp. 1–37. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2026.150487.
Abstract: Understanding the nutritional quality of plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs) is important for consumers, manufacturers, and health professionals. This study examined nine commercial PBMAs, focusing on protein digestibility and iron dialyzability. In vitro protein digestibility ranged from 81 to 96%, comparable to meat (86–90%), and was highest in protein concentrates and isolates (97–99%). Extrusion conditions (150–750 rpm, 100–160 °C) had minimal impact on digestibility but significantly affected texture and sensory properties. Dialysable iron in PBMAs was lower (2–5%) than in fungi-based products (15–32%) and meat (2–40%), though PBMAs had higher total iron content. Iron fortification using ferrous citrate, fumarate, sulphate and ferric pyrophosphate yielded dialysable iron values of 1.9–3.4%. These findings provide valuable insights into the nutritional composition of PBMAs and highlight opportunities to optimize processing for improved iron bioavailability.
Description: Data availability: Underlying data has been uploaded to the institutional repository.
Supplementary data are available online at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308814626026476?via%3Dihub#s0075 .
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33656
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2026.150487
ISSN: 0308-8146
Appears in Collections:Department of Chemical Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under a Creative Commons license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).1.23 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons