Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33725
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorErcal, Orhan-
dc.contributor.authorShafique, Muhammad-
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-18T16:38:03Z-
dc.date.available2026-08-18T16:38:03Z-
dc.date.issued2026-06-11-
dc.identifier.citationErcal, O. and Shafique, M. (2026) 'From design to decarbonisation: a BIM-based comparative analysis of embodied carbon in buildings', Carbon Footprints, 5(2), 32, pp. 1–18. doi: 10.20517/cf.2026.02.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33725-
dc.descriptionAvailability of data and materials: Data in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.en_GB
dc.descriptionSupplementary Materials are available online at: https://image.oaes.cc/published/article/eb5d33b49c8ad0a26385ba60c48af548/cf6002-SupplementaryMaterials.pdf .en_GB
dc.description.abstractThe construction industry is a significant contributor to global carbon emissions, with embodied carbon accounting for a growing proportion of building life-cycle emissions. Comparative analyses that assess various structural systems within a single, controlled building design remain limited, despite increasing interest in building information modelling- life cycle assessment (BIM-LCA) integration. This study addresses this gap by providing a BIM-based assessment framework that quantifies and compares the embodied carbon of three structural systems (steel, reinforced concrete, and timber) applied to an identical conceptual two-storey residential structure in the UK. Material quantities were extracted from a parametric Revit model and integrated with emission factors within a cradle-to-gate (A1-A3) system boundary. The results indicate that total embodied carbon amounts to 104,165 kgCO₂eq for a traditional steel house, 84,640 kgCO₂eq for a traditional reinforced concrete house, and 51,255 kgCO₂eq for a traditional timber house. By employing low-carbon material alternatives, embodied carbon is reduced by 40.4% in the steel house, 32.2% in the concrete house, and 19.7% in the timber house, respectively. Thus, encouraging early-stage sustainable design decisions can make a substantial contribution to the decarbonisation of the built environment.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNot applicable.en_GB
dc.format.extentpp. 1–18-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherOAE Publishingen_GB
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectembodied carbonen_GB
dc.subjectcarbon footprinten_GB
dc.subjectbuilding materialsen_GB
dc.subjectlow-carbon materialsen_GB
dc.subjectbuilding information modellingen_GB
dc.titleFrom design to decarbonisation: a BIM-based comparative analysis of embodied carbon in buildingsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.dateAccepted2026-05-19-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.20517/cf.2026.02-
dc.relation.isPartOfCarbon Footprintsen_GB
pubs.issue2-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume5-
dc.identifier.eissn2831-932X-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2026-05-19-
dcterms.issued2026-06-11-
dc.date.updated2026-08-14T09:35:15Z-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
dc.contributor.orcidShafique, Muhammad [0000-0002-1581-6980]-
dc.identifier.number32-
Appears in Collections:Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2026. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), and indicate if changes were made3.5 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons