Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33725Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Ercal, Orhan | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Shafique, Muhammad | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-18T16:38:03Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-08-18T16:38:03Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-06-11 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ercal, O. and Shafique, M. (2026) 'From design to decarbonisation: a BIM-based comparative analysis of embodied carbon in buildings', Carbon Footprints, 5(2), 32, pp. 1–18. doi: 10.20517/cf.2026.02. | en_GB |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33725 | - |
| dc.description | Availability of data and materials: Data in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. | en_GB |
| dc.description | Supplementary Materials are available online at: https://image.oaes.cc/published/article/eb5d33b49c8ad0a26385ba60c48af548/cf6002-SupplementaryMaterials.pdf . | en_GB |
| dc.description.abstract | The construction industry is a significant contributor to global carbon emissions, with embodied carbon accounting for a growing proportion of building life-cycle emissions. Comparative analyses that assess various structural systems within a single, controlled building design remain limited, despite increasing interest in building information modelling- life cycle assessment (BIM-LCA) integration. This study addresses this gap by providing a BIM-based assessment framework that quantifies and compares the embodied carbon of three structural systems (steel, reinforced concrete, and timber) applied to an identical conceptual two-storey residential structure in the UK. Material quantities were extracted from a parametric Revit model and integrated with emission factors within a cradle-to-gate (A1-A3) system boundary. The results indicate that total embodied carbon amounts to 104,165 kgCO₂eq for a traditional steel house, 84,640 kgCO₂eq for a traditional reinforced concrete house, and 51,255 kgCO₂eq for a traditional timber house. By employing low-carbon material alternatives, embodied carbon is reduced by 40.4% in the steel house, 32.2% in the concrete house, and 19.7% in the timber house, respectively. Thus, encouraging early-stage sustainable design decisions can make a substantial contribution to the decarbonisation of the built environment. | en_GB |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Not applicable. | en_GB |
| dc.format.extent | pp. 1–18 | - |
| dc.format.medium | Electronic | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
| dc.publisher | OAE Publishing | en_GB |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License | - |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | - |
| dc.subject | embodied carbon | en_GB |
| dc.subject | carbon footprint | en_GB |
| dc.subject | building materials | en_GB |
| dc.subject | low-carbon materials | en_GB |
| dc.subject | building information modelling | en_GB |
| dc.title | From design to decarbonisation: a BIM-based comparative analysis of embodied carbon in buildings | en_GB |
| dc.type | Article | en_GB |
| dc.date.dateAccepted | 2026-05-19 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.20517/cf.2026.02 | - |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Carbon Footprints | en_GB |
| pubs.issue | 2 | - |
| pubs.publication-status | Published online | - |
| pubs.volume | 5 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2831-932X | - |
| dc.rights.license | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en | - |
| dcterms.dateAccepted | 2026-05-19 | - |
| dcterms.issued | 2026-06-11 | - |
| dc.date.updated | 2026-08-14T09:35:15Z | - |
| dc.rights.holder | The Author(s) | - |
| dc.contributor.orcid | Shafique, Muhammad [0000-0002-1581-6980] | - |
| dc.identifier.number | 32 | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research Papers | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FullText.pdf | Copyright © The Author(s) 2026. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), and indicate if changes were made | 3.5 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License