Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33726
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFu, Pengfei-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yin-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Tong-
dc.contributor.authorSarpong, David-
dc.contributor.authorOfosu, George-
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-18T17:07:35Z-
dc.date.available2026-08-18T17:07:35Z-
dc.date.issued2026-08-11-
dc.identifier.citationFu, P. et al. (2026) 'The local mediation of rural cultural governance: Problematization, asymmetry, and displaced agency in China's rural cultural revitalization', Journal of Rural Studies, 127, 104361, pp. 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104361.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0743-0167-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33726-
dc.descriptionData availability: Data will be made available on request.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines how rural cultural revitalization in China is shaped through the local implementation of national policy, development agendas, and commercial investment. Rather than viewing national policy as a uniform force, it explores how policy goals related to cultural protection, public cultural services, and rural development are translated into local projects. The study combines critical discourse analysis of major national policy documents issued between 2021 and 2024 with a documentary case study of Gongcheng in southern China. The findings show that national policy frames rural culture through interconnected logics of protection, improvement, and development. These policy orientations provide a flexible framework that local governments can adapt through tourism promotion, investment attraction, and wellness-related initiatives. In Gongcheng, cultural resources such as ethnic traditions, food culture, ecological landscapes, and health-related knowledge have increasingly been incorporated into development strategies and market-oriented projects. While these initiatives can enhance cultural visibility, infrastructure, and economic opportunities, they may also create unequal access to cultural decision-making, representation, and economic benefits. The paper argues that the key challenge of rural cultural revitalization lies in how policy is mediated through local governance and state–market arrangements. It concludes that more inclusive approaches are needed to strengthen local participation, improve benefit-sharing, and support rural communities as active contributors to cultural development.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (25CXW056) and Shanghai Pujiang Talent Programme (24PJC056).en_US
dc.format.extentpp. 1-10-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsRe-use licence for this version: CC BY-NC-ND-
dc.rightsLicence for published version: CC BY-NC-ND-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectrural cultural revitalizationen_US
dc.subjectrural restructuringen_US
dc.subjectcritical discourse analysisen_US
dc.subjecturban–rural divideen_US
dc.subjectlocal policy mediationen_US
dc.subjectpublic cultural servicesen_US
dc.subjectcultural governanceen_US
dc.subjectChinaen_US
dc.subject1205 Urban and Regional Planningen_US
dc.subject1604 Human Geographyen_US
dc.subject1608 Sociologyen_US
dc.subjectGeographyen_US
dc.titleThe local mediation of rural cultural governance: Problematization, asymmetry, and displaced agency in China's rural cultural revitalizationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2026-08-06-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104361-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Rural Studiesen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume127-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-1392-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2026-08-06-
dcterms.descriptionHighlights: • This paper critically examines the contradictions in China's rural cultural revitalization policies and its vicissitudes for rural life. • Rural cultural revitalization is conceptualized as a politically mediated phase of rural restructuring. • Three interlocking mechanisms through which these policies operate as cultural governance are identified. • Policy discourse simultaneously valorises rural culture as national heritage and frames it as a developmental deficit.en_US
dcterms.issued2026-08-11-
dc.date.updated2026-08-18T17:01:44Z-
dc.rights.holderThe Authors-
dc.contributor.orcidFu, Pengfei [0000-0002-8468-8484]-
dc.contributor.orcidWu, Tong [0009-0006-7012-5943]-
dc.contributor.orcidSarpong, David [0000-0002-1533-4332]-
dc.contributor.orcidOfosu, George [0000-0001-5441-0572]-
dc.identifier.number104361-
Appears in Collections:Department of Strategy, Entrepreneurship and Management Research Papers *

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc-nd/4.0/ ).1.47 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons