Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33753
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPassadis, Konstantinos-
dc.contributor.authorPachakis, Giannis-
dc.contributor.authorMalamis, Dimitris-
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-24T15:22:45Z-
dc.date.available2026-08-24T15:22:45Z-
dc.date.issued2026-08-17-
dc.identifier.citationPassadis, K., Pachakis, G. and Malamis, D. (2026) 'Life Cycle Environmental Assessment of a Demonstration-Scale OFMSW Biorefinery Producing Advanced Biofuels', Clean Technologies, 8(4), 134, pp. 1–27. doi: 10.3390/cleantechnol8040134.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33753-
dc.descriptionData Availability Statement: The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.en_US
dc.descriptionSupplementary Materials are available online at: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/8/4/134#app1-cleantechnol-08-00134 .en_US
dc.description.abstractBiorefineries that convert the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) into advanced biofuels can integrate waste management with renewable energy production. However, their environmental performance remains insufficiently characterised owing to a scarcity of life cycle assessment (LCA) studies based on real operational data. This study presents a gate-to-gate LCA of a demonstration biorefinery processing source-separated food waste into bio-oils, bioethanol, and biogas. The ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) method was applied across 18 impact categories, with system expansion crediting the displacement of rapeseed oil, maize-derived ethanol, and marginal biogas-derived electricity. The net global warming potential (GWP) was 68.5 kg CO2 eq per tonne of wet OFMSW (69% reduction from gross), placing the biorefinery 83–93% below landfilling, 63% below incineration with CHP, and above standalone anaerobic digestion systems that lack the energy-intensive drying and enzymatic hydrolysis steps of the present configuration. Bio-oil and bioethanol achieved net-negative GWP per kilogram of product (−0.89 and −0.66 kg CO2 eq, respectively), whilst eleven of eighteen categories achieved net savings under system expansion. Enzyme production dominated the bioethanol environmental profile (37–94% across categories), whilst drying dominated bio-oil (46–93%). Monte Carlo simulation confirmed that the sign of the net impact stayed unchanged across the entire 95% confidence interval (the interval did not span zero) for 17 of 18 categories.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 101084405 (CRONUS).en_US
dc.format.extentpp. 1–27-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPI-
dc.rightsRe-use licence for this version: CC BY-
dc.rightsLicence for published version: CC BY-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectbiorefineryen_US
dc.subjectOFMSWen_US
dc.subjectlife cycle assessmenten_US
dc.subjectadvanced biofuelsen_US
dc.subjectSimaProen_US
dc.subjectenvironmental hotspotsen_US
dc.subjectsystem expansionen_US
dc.titleLife Cycle Environmental Assessment of a Demonstration-Scale OFMSW Biorefinery Producing Advanced Biofuelsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2026-08-15-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol8040134-
dc.relation.isPartOfClean Technologiesen_US
pubs.issue4-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume8-
dc.identifier.eissn2571-8797-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2026-08-15-
dcterms.issued2026-08-17-
dc.date.updated2026-08-24T15:22:06Z-
dc.rights.holderThe authors-
dc.contributor.orcidPassadis, Konstantinos [0009-0000-7243-5853]-
dc.contributor.orcidPachakis, Giannis [0009-0004-3568-3208]-
dc.contributor.orcidMalamis, Dimitris [0000-0002-6472-6420]-
dc.identifier.number134-
Appears in Collections:Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).8.46 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons