Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33800
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBiddle, Stuart JH-
dc.contributor.authorBrierley, Marsha L-
dc.contributor.authorChater, Angel M-
dc.contributor.authorEdwardson, Charlotte L-
dc.contributor.authorCastle, Ellen-
dc.contributor.authorHunt, Emily R-
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Daniel P-
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-01T11:33:31Z-
dc.date.available2026-09-01T11:33:31Z-
dc.date.issued2026-09-03-
dc.identifier.citationBiddle, S.J.H. et al. (2026) 'Sedentary behaviour change: barriers and strategies reported by individuals with type 2 diabetes during a multi-component intervention', Journal of Activity, Sedentary and Sleep Behaviors, 0(in press, proof), pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1186/s44167-026-00112-3.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33800-
dc.descriptionData availability: All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information.en_US
dc.descriptionThis Article in Press is shared early to give you faster access to new research. It is citable and carries a permanent DOI. The final edited version will replace it when available.en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Engaging in high volumes of sedentary behaviour increases the risk of adverse health outcomes, especially for individuals with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Understanding likely influences on behaviour and effective strategies for reducing sedentary time, as explored in this study, can inform future intervention development and implementation. Methods: A randomised controlled feasibility trial was undertaken to evaluate a remotely delivered sedentary behaviour intervention in adults with T2DM. As part of the process evaluation, intervention participants (n = 35) were asked to report the barriers they experienced, and strategies adopted, in their efforts to reduce sitting time. Results: Using template analysis, 44 statements of barriers (from n = 18) and 99 statements of attempted behaviour change strategies (from n = 17) from two time periods were analysed. Themes were similar across 3- and 6-month data for barriers [fatigue/sleep (e.g., feeling drowsy), disability/health, work-related (e.g., work tasks and facilities), and context (social or environmental contextual barriers)]. The themes for strategies reflected behaviours associated with ways to break up sitting, increasing incidental physical activity, and adding in purposeful physical activity. Conclusions: Barriers reflected various individual and contextual factors, while change strategies centred on breaking up sitting through substitution of other behaviours and the use of different types of physical activity. Such information may prove useful in future interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipA tailored intervention to reduce sitting behaviour in people with Type 2 Diabetes: A randomised-controlled feasibility study | Funder: Diabetes UKen_US
dc.format.extentpp. 1–9-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Central (part of Springer Nature)en_US
dc.rightsRe-use licence for this version: CC BY-
dc.rightsLicence for published version: CC BY-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectbarriersen_US
dc.subjectbehaviour changeen_US
dc.subjectdiabetesen_US
dc.subjectsedentary behaviouren_US
dc.subjectphysical activityen_US
dc.subjectintervention strategiesen_US
dc.titleSedentary behaviour change: barriers and strategies reported by individuals with type 2 diabetes during a multi-component interventionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2026-08-24-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s44167-026-00112-3-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Activity, Sedentary and Sleep Behaviors-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume00-
dc.identifier.eissn2731-4391-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2026-08-24-
dcterms.issued2026-09-03-
dc.date.updated2026-09-01T09:56:40Z-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
dc.contributor.orcidBailey, Daniel [0000-0003-3772-630X]-
Appears in Collections:Department of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences Embargoed Research Papers *

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2026 The Author(s).. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.910.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons