Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33887
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJaramillo, Caitlin-
dc.contributor.authorAljoubory, Janna-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Kok Siew-
dc.contributor.authorQi, Kun-
dc.contributor.authorFern, George-
dc.contributor.authorIacovidou, Eleni-
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-21T06:40:50Z-
dc.date.available2026-09-21T06:40:50Z-
dc.date.issued2026-10-16-
dc.identifier.citationJaramillo, C. et al. 'Life Cycle Assessment of Virgin and Recycled Polypropylene Kitchenware in the UK: Impacts of Domestic Recycling, International Supply Chains, and Consumer Use', Journal of Circular Economy, 4(2), pp. 1–26. doi: 10.55845/t4f1dj13.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33887-
dc.descriptionData Availability Statement Supporting data and the LCA calculation files are provided in the supplementary materials. Primary data used in the assessment were provided by ReBorn, UK and Biffa Polymers. The data sources and life cycle inventory datasets used in the assessment are identified in the manuscript and supplementary materials. Proprietary datasets, including ecoinvent data, cannot be redistributed and remain subject to the terms and conditions of the respective data providers. Additional information required to reproduce the analysis is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.en_GB
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluates the cradle-to-grave environmental performance of polypropylene (PP) kitchenware in the United Kingdom (UK), addressing critical gaps in understanding how material choices, global supply chains, domestic recycling, and consumer use-phase practices interact. Four scenarios were assessed using life cycle assessment (LCA) modelling: virgin PP (vPP) manufactured in China and Germany, recycled PP (rPP) produced in the UK, and a 50:50 vPP–rPP blend. Environmental impacts evaluated using the ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) and IPCC 2021 GWP100 showed that under the modelled scenarios, UK-produced rPP reduces global warming potential (GWP) by about 53% compared with imported vPP, and by 22% compared with UK-manufactured vPP from Germany, driven by avoided virgin polymer production, the absence of long-distance shipping and end-of-life recycling. Toxicity-related impacts revealed trade-offs associated with recycling processes. The rPP product reduced terrestrial ecotoxicity and human non-carcinogenic toxicity by approximately 36% and 16% relative to imported vPP, demonstrating rPP’s potential to reduce toxicity-related impacts. Consumer use-phase practices (routine household dishwashing) contributed substantially to lifecycle impacts, becoming the dominant life cycle stage (30-64% of GWP) as material-related impacts were reduced. The study demonstrates that the environmental performance of consumer plastics requires integrated consideration of material systems efficiency, geography, supply-chain arrangements, recycling infrastructure, and consumer behaviour. Such an approach can promote circularity in polymer value chains, with the potential to generate substantial environmental, economic, technical and social benefits.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipReBorn, UK, through a studentshipen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Interdisciplinary Centre for the Circular Chemical Economy and Innovate UK (grant number 10062038)-
dc.format.extentpp. 1–26-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherDSRPT UG and Roskilde Universityen_GB
dc.rightsRe-use licence for this version: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectlife cycle assessmenten_GB
dc.subjectrecycled polypropyleneen_GB
dc.subjectvirgin polypropyleneen_GB
dc.subjectcarbon footprinten_GB
dc.subjectcircular economyen_GB
dc.subjectplastics recyclingen_GB
dc.titleLife Cycle Assessment of Virgin and Recycled Polypropylene Kitchenware in the UK: Impacts of Domestic Recycling, International Supply Chains, and Consumer Useen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.dateAccepted2026-08-19-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.55845/t4f1dj13-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Circular Economy-
pubs.issue2-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume4-
dc.identifier.eissn2752-163X-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dc.rights.licenseLicence for published version: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International-
dcterms.dateAccepted2026-08-19-
dcterms.issued2026-10-16-
dc.date.updated2026-09-11T11:41:46Z-
dc.rights.holderCaitlin Jaramillo, Janna Aljoubory, Kok Siew Ng, Kun Qi, George R. Fern, Eleni Iacovidou (Authors)-
dc.contributor.orcidNg, Kok Siew [0000-0001-7689-2832]-
dc.contributor.orcidQi, Kun [0000-0003-2348-5007]-
dc.contributor.orcidFern, George [0000-0002-0016-5038]-
dc.contributor.orcidIacovidou, Eleni [0000-0001-6841-0995]-
Appears in Collections:Department of Chemical Engineering Research Papers
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2026 Caitlin Jaramillo, Janna Aljoubory, Kok Siew Ng, Kun Qi, George R. Fern, Eleni Iacovidou (Authors). Creative Commons License. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).1.47 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons