Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/34027
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShaukat, Amama-
dc.contributor.authorTrojanowski, Grzegorz-
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T13:57:25Z-
dc.date.available2026-10-18T13:57:25Z-
dc.date.issued2026-08-24-
dc.identifier.citationShaukat, A. and Trojanowski, G. (2026) 'Environmental Disclosure Versus Environmental Performance: Implications for Corporate Financial Performance and Risk', Risks, 14(9), 192, pp. 1–17. doi: 10.3390/risks14090192.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/34027-
dc.descriptionData Availability Statement: The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because of the commercial reasons. All the data have been obtained from a commercial providers listed in the article. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to these commercial data providers.en_US
dc.description.abstractEnvironmental considerations shape corporate strategy, risk management, and firm valuation. Yet, empirical evidence on the links between environmental performance, environmental disclosures and corporate financial performance is mixed and often omits risk implications. We develop a holistic framework to examine the endogenous inter-relations among corporate environmental performance (CEP), environmental disclosure (CED), financial performance, and risk. Employing 3SLS, we analyse the simultaneous links between CEP, CED, and market-based measures of performance and risk for a large panel (7877 firm-year observations) of US-listed firms over 2005–2020. The findings reveal that environmental performance and environmental disclosure have distinct economic implications. Environmental performance is associated with lower market valuation and lower market risk. These findings suggest that while substantive environmental initiatives may enhance organisational resilience, investors are not appropriately factoring the associated benefits in firm valuation. In contrast, environmental disclosure is associated with higher market valuation and higher market risk. Thus, environmental communication may enhance corporate legitimacy and strengthen stakeholder relations while simultaneously increasing investor awareness of environmental exposures and sustainability-related uncertainties. We also find a strong positive association between environmental performance and environmental disclosure, suggesting that environmental reporting increasingly reflects underlying environmental actions rather than symbolic signalling alone. Overall, the results highlight the importance of distinguishing between environmental actions and environmental communication when evaluating corporate environmental strategy, firm value, and risk. Overall, the results carry implications for managers, investors, regulators, and researchers seeking to evaluate the role of corporate environmental strategy in corporate resilience, transparency, and value creation.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research received no external fundingen_US
dc.format.extentpp. 1–17-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsRe-use licence for this version: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International-
dc.rightsLicence for published version: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectESG disclosureen_US
dc.subjectenvironmental performance;en_US
dc.subjectcorporate risken_US
dc.subjectfinancial performanceen_US
dc.subjectfinancial risken_US
dc.subjectoperating risk;en_US
dc.subjectmarket risken_US
dc.subjectsustainability reportingen_US
dc.subjectcorporate environmental strategyen_US
dc.subjectendogeneityen_US
dc.subject.other1502 Banking, Finance and Investment-
dc.subject.other1503 Business and Management-
dc.titleEnvironmental Disclosure Versus Environmental Performance: Implications for Corporate Financial Performance and Risken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2026-08-19-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/risks14090192-
dc.relation.isPartOfRisksen_US
pubs.issue9-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume14-
dc.identifier.eissn2227-9091-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2026-08-19-
dcterms.issued2026-08-24-
dc.date.updated2026-10-18T13:51:57Z-
dc.rights.holderThe authors-
dc.contributor.orcidShaukat, Amama [0000-0002-5137-7006]-
dc.contributor.orcidTrojanowski, Grzegorz [0000-0003-4715-7286]-
dc.identifier.number192-
Appears in Collections:Department of Economics, Finance and Accounting Research Papers *

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.514.37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons