Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/34104
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKerssies, Niek-
dc.contributor.authorSegovia-Martin, Jose-
dc.contributor.authorWinters, James-
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-28T17:32:51Z-
dc.date.available2026-10-28T17:32:51Z-
dc.date.issued2025-07-01-
dc.identifier.citationKerssies, N., Segovia-Martin, J. and Winters, J. (2025) 'Connect-while-in-range: Modelling the impact of spatial constraints on dynamic network structures', PLOS Complex Systems, 2(7), e0000051, pp.1–19. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcsy.0000051.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/34104-
dc.descriptionData Availability: This model was coded in Python using the Networkx package. The code including detailed instructions is publicly available on github: https://github.com/niekkerssies/Range-model .en_US
dc.descriptionSupporting information is available online at: https://journals.plos.org/complexsystems/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcsy.0000051#sec014 .en_US
dc.description.abstractLike other social animals and biological systems, human groups constantly exchange information. Network models provide a way of quantifying this process by representing the pathways of information propagation between individuals. Existing approaches to studying these networks largely hypothesize network formation to be a result of cognitive biases and choices about who to connect to. Observational data suggests, however, that physical proximity plays a major role in shaping the formation of communication networks in human groups. Here we report results from a series of agent-based simulations in which agents move around at random in a bounded 2D space and connect while within range. Comparing the results to a non-spatial model, we show how including spatial constraints impacts our predictions of network structure: range model networks are more clustered, with slightly higher degree, higher average shortest path length, a lower number of connected components and a higher small-world index. We find two important drivers of network structure in range model networks: communication range relative to environment size, and population density. These results show that neglecting spatial constraints in models of network formation makes a difference for predicted network structures. Our simulation model quantifies this part of the process of network formation, realized by simply situating individuals in an environment. The model also provides a tool to include spatial constraints in other models of human network generation, as well as dynamic models of network formation more generally.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author(s) received no specific funding for this worken_US
dc.format.extente0000051-e0000051-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)en_US
dc.rightsRe-use licence for this version: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International-
dc.rightsLicence for published version: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectmathematical modelsen_US
dc.subjectnetwork analysisen_US
dc.subjectpopulation densityen_US
dc.subjectgraphsen_US
dc.subjectpopulation sizeen_US
dc.subjectagent-based modelingen_US
dc.subjectmusculoskeletal mechanicsen_US
dc.subjectsocial communicationen_US
dc.titleConnect-while-in-range: Modelling the impact of spatial constraints on dynamic network structuresen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2025-05-12-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcsy.0000051-
dc.relation.isPartOfPLOS Complex Systems-
pubs.issue7-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume2-
dc.identifier.eissn2837-8830-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2025-05-12-
dcterms.descriptionAuthor summary: Much like neuroscientists require a solid understanding of the connections between each neuron in order to understand cognition, we need a solid understanding of communication pathways between individuals in order to understand the collective intelligence of groups. One major difference from brains is that individuals can move around in an environment, constantly changing communication networks. We simulated this dynamic effect of movement in an environment on network structure, by simulating a population of agents moving around in a 2D coordinate space and forming temporary connections while within a specified range. These simulations allowed us to understand the formation of networks under different spatial circumstances, quantifying the impact of communication range, population size and environment size on the properties of the resulting networks. This allows to us understand part of human networks without assuming individual connection preferences, focusing instead on the basic fact that people exist and communicate in an environment.en_US
dcterms.issued2025-07-01-
dc.date.updated2026-10-26T10:50:08Z-
dc.rights.holderKerssies et al.-
dc.contributor.orcidKerssies, Niek [0009-0007-3473-268X]-
dc.contributor.orcidWinters, James [0000-0003-2982-2991]-
Appears in Collections:Department of Psychology Research Papers *

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright: © 2025 Kerssies et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.2.64 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons