Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDavis, EP-
dc.contributor.authorHu, YW-
dc.identifier.citationEconomics and Finance Working papers, Brunel University, 08-13.en
dc.description.abstractWe investigate the performance of Canadian pension funds relative to those from the UK and US, in the light of the ongoing quantitative asset restrictions that still apply in Canada, compared with the purer prudent person approach in the UK and US. We find that although Canadian funds often obtain better combinations of return and risk, returns are often less than could be obtained given financial market conditions, as shown by dummy portfolios split evenly between bonds and equities, or diversified into real estate, as well as mean-variance optimal portfolios. In contrast, UK and US funds typically outperform such benchmarks. Combined with criticisms of specific Canadian regulations in the light of finance theory and empirical evidence, the paper makes a case for removal of residual quantitative restrictions in Canada, and their replacement by sole prudent person regulations.en
dc.format.extent706944 bytes-
dc.publisherBrunel Universityen
dc.subjectpension funds; regulation; prudent person rule; quantitative asset restriction; mean-variance optimisation; Canadaen
dc.titleAre Canadian pension plans disadvantaged by the current structure of portfolio regulation?en
dc.typeResearch Paperen
Appears in Collections:Economics and Finance
Dept of Economics and Finance Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
0813.pdf690.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.