Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/5045
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPal, S-
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, S-
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-18T09:28:03Z-
dc.date.available2011-04-18T09:28:03Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationEconomics and Finance Working Paper, Brunel University, 10-20en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/5045-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we explore how in the world’s largest democracy, India, the presence of different elite groups – the dominant landed and capitalist elite and the minority elite (who are the elected representatives of the marginalised women and low caste population) – could affect the nature and extent of public spending on various accounts, especially education. Our results suggest that the dominant landed elite tends to be unresponsive to the underlying poverty rate while the capitalist elite respond to the poverty rate by increasing the share of education spending. After controlling for all other factors, presence of the minority elite has a limited impact, if at all. Results are robust to alternative specifications.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBrunel Universityen_US
dc.subjectLiteracy ratesen_US
dc.subjectLanded eliteen_US
dc.subjectCapitalist eliteen_US
dc.subjectMinority eliteen_US
dc.subjectMarginalised pooren_US
dc.subjectPublic education spendingen_US
dc.subjectPanel estimatesen_US
dc.subjectEndogeneity biasen_US
dc.subjectIndian statesen_US
dc.titlePoverty, heterogeneous elite, and allocation of public spending: Panel evidence from the Indian Statesen_US
dc.typeResearch Paperen_US
Appears in Collections:Economics and Finance
Dept of Economics and Finance Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1020[1].pdf314.93 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.