Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/6031
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Badar, ME | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-12-02T09:38:07Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-12-02T09:38:07Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | New Criminal Law Review, 12(3), 433 - 467, Summer 2009 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1933-4192 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/6031 | - |
dc.description | Copyright @ 2009 University of California Press | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Article 30 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court provides a general definition for the mental element required to trigger the criminal responsibility of individuals for serious violations of international humanitarian law. At first sight, it appears that the explicit words of Article 30 are sufficient to put an end to a long-lasting debate regarding the mens rea enigma that has confronted the jurisprudence of the two ad hoc Tribunals for the last decade, but this is not true. Recent decisions rendered by the International Criminal Court evidence the discrepancy among the ICC Pre-Trial Chambers in interpreting the exact meaning of Article 30 of the ICC Statute. The paper challenges that dolus eventualis is one of the genuine and independent pillars of criminal responsibility that forms, on its own, the basis of intentional crimes, and suggests its inclusion in the legal standard of Article 30 of the ICC Statute. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of California Press | en_US |
dc.title | Dolus eventualis and the Rome statute without it? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2009.12.3.433 | - |
pubs.organisational-data | /Brunel | - |
pubs.organisational-data | /Brunel/Brunel (Active) | - |
pubs.organisational-data | /Brunel/Brunel (Active)/Brunel Law School | - |
pubs.organisational-data | /Brunel/Brunel Law School (RG) | - |
pubs.organisational-data | /Brunel/Brunel Law School (RG)/CIPL | - |
pubs.organisational-data | /Brunel/Research Centres (RG) | - |
pubs.organisational-data | /Brunel/Research Centres (RG)/CIPL | - |
Appears in Collections: | Law Publications Brunel Law School Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fulltext.pdf | 168.5 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.