Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10548
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChappell, A-
dc.contributor.authorErnest, P-
dc.contributor.authorLudhra, G-
dc.contributor.authorMendick, H-
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-13T11:22:01Z-
dc.date.available2014-
dc.date.available2015-04-13T11:22:01Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationChappell, A., Ernest, P., Ludhra, G. and Mendick, H. (2014) Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 22 (1), pp. 137-156. doi: 10.1080/14681366.2013.877205.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1468-1366-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10548-
dc.descriptionThis article has been made available through the Brunel Open Access Publishing Fund.-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we look at what engaging with psychoanalysis, through psychosocial accounts of subjectivity, has contributed to our struggles for legitimacy and security within our ways of knowing. The psychosocial, with its insistence on the unconscious and the irrational, features as both a source of security and of insecurity. We use three examples drawn from our own empirical research to explore the entanglement of the researcher with the researched and how this can offer a re-imagined sense of legitimacy for our work. In elaborating our argument, we discuss our experiences of 'being captured' by data and participants, and of negotiating the ethics of analysing participants' accounts. © 2014 The Author(s). Published by Pedagogy, Culture & Society.en_US
dc.format.extent137 - 156-
dc.format.extent137 - 156-
dc.languageeng-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.rights© 2014 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. This is an Open Access article. Non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly attributed, cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way, is permitted. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.-
dc.subjectepistemologyen_US
dc.subjectethicsen_US
dc.subjectmethodologyen_US
dc.subjectpsychosocialen_US
dc.subjectsubjectivityen_US
dc.titleExplorations in knowing: thinking psychosocially about legitimacyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2013.877205-
dc.relation.isPartOfPedagogy, Culture and Society-
dc.relation.isPartOfPedagogy, Culture and Society-
pubs.issue1-
pubs.issue1-
pubs.volume22-
pubs.volume22-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by College/Department/Division-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by College/Department/Division/College of Business, Arts and Social Sciences-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by College/Department/Division/College of Business, Arts and Social Sciences/Dept of Education-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by College/Department/Division/College of Business, Arts and Social Sciences/Dept of Education/Education-
dc.identifier.eissn1747-5104-
Appears in Collections:Brunel OA Publishing Fund
Dept of Education Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf212.28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.