Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/12139
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGoodman, C-
dc.contributor.authorDavies, SL-
dc.contributor.authorGordon, AL-
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, J-
dc.contributor.authorDening, T-
dc.contributor.authorGladman, JRF-
dc.contributor.authorIliffe, S-
dc.contributor.authorZubair, M-
dc.contributor.authorBowman, C-
dc.contributor.authorVictor, C-
dc.contributor.authorMartin, FC-
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-19T11:17:21Z-
dc.date.available2015-01-01-
dc.date.available2016-02-19T11:17:21Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the American Medical Directors Association,16(5): pp. 427 - 432, (2015)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1525-8610-
dc.identifier.issn1538-9375-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861015000730-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/12139-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To explore what commissioners of care, regulators, providers, and care home residents in England identify as the key mechanisms or components of different service delivery models that support the provision of National Health Service (NHS) provision to independent care homes. Methods: Qualitative, semistructured interviews with a purposive sample of people with direct experience of commissioning, providing, and regulating health care provision in care homes and care home residents. Data from interviews were augmented by a secondary analysis of previous interviews with care home residents on their personal experience of and priorities for access to health care. Analysis was framed by the assumptions of realist evaluation and drew on the constant comparative method to identify key themes about what is required to achieve quality health care provision to care homes and resident health. Results: Participants identified 3 overlapping approaches to the provision of NHS that they believed supported access to health care for older people in care homes: (1) Investment in relational working that fostered continuity and shared learning between visiting NHS staff and care home staff, (2) the provision of age-appropriate clinical services, and (3) governance arrangements that used contractual and financial incentives to specify a minimum service that care homes should receive. Conclusion: The 3 approaches, and how they were typified as working, provide a rich picture of the stakeholder perspectives and the underlying assumptions about how service delivery models should work with care homes. The findings inform how evidence on effective working in care homes will be interrogated to identify how different approaches, or specifically key elements of those approaches, achieve different health-related outcomes in different situations for residents and associated health and social care organizations.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen Access funded by Department of Health UK.en_US
dc.format.extent427 - 432-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectCare homesen_US
dc.subjectOlder peopleen_US
dc.subjectHealth servicesen_US
dc.subjectFrailtyen_US
dc.subjectHealth careen_US
dc.subjectRealist reviewen_US
dc.titleRelationships, expertise, incentives, and governance: Supporting care home residents' access to health care: An interview study from Englanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2015.01.072-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of the American Medical Directors Association-
pubs.issue5-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume16-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf199.35 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.