Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/12826
Title: | On The Odiousness of Greek Debt |
Other Titles: | Odious debt as a claim under international law: Lessons from the Greek debt truth comittee |
Authors: | Bantekas, I Vivien, R |
Keywords: | odious debt;international law;international foreign investment law;international finance law;Greek Debt Truth Committee |
Issue Date: | 23-Dec-2016 |
Publisher: | Wiley |
Citation: | Bantekas, I. and Vivien, R. (2016) 'On The Odiousness of Greek Debt', European Law Journal, 22: 539– 565. doi: 10.1111/eulj.12184. |
Abstract: | Sovereign indebtedness has been approached from a twofold approach in the international law literature. The first, championed by international finance scholars, posits no questions as regards the legality of the debt and concentrates on debt management, chiefly, if not exclusively, as engineered by lending states and international financial institutions (IFIs). The second approach examines the origins and legality of sovereign debt and its adherents comprise both human rights lawyers as well as general public international law scholars. It is on the basis of the latter scholarship that the concept known as odious debt came to prominence. |
URI: | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/12826 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12184 |
ISSN: | 1351-5993 |
Appears in Collections: | Brunel Law School Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FullText.pdf | 273.98 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.