Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/13147
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Mullen, KA | - |
dc.contributor.author | Manuel, DG | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hawken, SJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pipe, AL | - |
dc.contributor.author | Coyle, D | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hobler, LA | - |
dc.contributor.author | Younger, J | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wells, GA | - |
dc.contributor.author | Reid, RD | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-09-15T13:16:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-05-24 | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-09-15T13:16:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Tobacco Control, 2016 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0964-4563 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/13147 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Tobacco-related illnesses are leading causes of death and healthcare use. Our objective was to determine whether implementation of a hospitalinitiated smoking cessation intervention would reduce mortality and downstream healthcare usage. Methods: A 2-group effectiveness study was completed comparing patients who received the ‘Ottawa Model’ for Smoking Cessation intervention (n=726) to usual care controls (n=641). Participants were current smokers, >17 years old, and recruited during admission to 1 of 14 participating hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Baseline data were linked to healthcare administrative data. Competing-risks regression analysis was used to compare outcomes between groups. Results: The intervention group experienced significantly lower rates of all-cause readmissions, smoking-related readmissions, and all-cause emergency department (ED) visits at all time points. The largest absolute risk reductions (ARR) were observed for allcause readmissions at 30 days (13.3% vs 7.1%; ARR, 6.1% (2.9% to 9.3%); p<0.001), 1 year (38.4% vs 26.7%; ARR, 11.7% (6.7% to 16.6%); p<0.001), and 2 years (45.2% vs 33.6%; ARR, 11.6% (6.5% to 16.8%); p<0.001). The greatest reduction in risk of allcause ED visits was at 30 days (20.9% vs 16.4%; ARR, 4.5% (0.4% to 8.7%); p=0.03). Reduction in mortality was not evident at 30 days, but significant reductions were observed by year 1 (11.4% vs 5.4%; ARR 6.0% (3.1% to 9.0%); p<0.001) and year 2 (15.1% vs 7.9%; ARR, 7.3% (3.9% to 10.7%); p<0.001). Conclusions: Considering the relatively low cost, greater adoption of hospital-initiated tobacco cessation interventions should be considered to improve patient outcomes and decrease subsequent healthcare usage. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.title | Effectiveness of a hospital-initiated smoking cessation programme: 2-year health and healthcare outcomes | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052728 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Tobacco Control | - |
pubs.publication-status | Accepted | - |
Appears in Collections: | Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FullText.pdf | 496.68 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.