Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1340
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Gobet, F | - |
dc.contributor.author | Simon, H A | - |
dc.coverage.spatial | 3 | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-11-24T12:23:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2007-11-24T12:23:41Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2000 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Gobet, F. & Simon, H. A. (2000). Reply to Lassiter. Psychological Science, Volume 11, Number 2, March 2000 , pp. 174-174(1) | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1340 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Lassiter’s new data on search and pattern recognition in chess are interesting, but his conclusions about their implications for theory are unfounded. | en |
dc.format.extent | 21687 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com | en |
dc.subject | chess | en |
dc.subject | pattern recognition | en |
dc.subject | search | en |
dc.subject | expertise | en |
dc.subject | correspondence chess | en |
dc.subject | Kasparov | en |
dc.subject | Holding | en |
dc.title | Reply to Lassiter | en |
dc.type | Research Paper | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00235 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Psychology Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FullText.pdf | 21.18 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.