Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Changing physical activity behaviour for people with multiple sclerosis: protocol of a randomised controlled feasibility trial (iStep-MS)
Authors: Ryan, J
Fortune, J
Stennett, A
Kilbride, C
Anokye, N
Victor, C
Hendrie, W
Abdul, M
De Souza, L
Lavelle, G
Brewin, D
David, L
Norris, M
Issue Date: 15-Nov-2017
Citation: Ryan, J. et al (2017) 'Changing physical activity behaviour for people with multiple sclerosis: protocol of a randomised controlled feasibility trial (iStep-MS)', BMJ Open, 7 (11), e018875, pp. 1 - 13. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018875.
Abstract: Copyright © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. Introduction: Although physical activity may reduce disease burden, fatigue and disability, and improve quality of life among people with multiple sclerosis (MS) many people with MS are physically inactive and spend significant time in sedentary behaviour. Behaviour-change interventions may assist people with MS to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour. However, few studies have investigated their effectiveness using objective measures of physical activity, particularly in the long-term. Further, interventions that have proven effective in the short-term may not be feasible in clinical practice because of the large amount of support provided. The iStep-MS trial aims to determine the safety, feasibility and acceptability of a behaviour-change intervention to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour among people with MS. Methods and analysis: Sixty people with MS will be randomised (1:1 ratio) to receive a 12-week intervention or usual care only. The intervention consists of four physical activity consultations with a physiotherapist supported by a handbook and pedometer. Outcomes assessed at baseline, 12 weeks and 9 months are physical activity (Actigraph GT3x-BT accelerometer), sedentary behaviour (activPAL3µ), self-reported activity and sitting time, walking capability, fatigue, self-efficacy, participation, quality of life, health service use. The safety of the intervention will be determined by assessing change in pain and fatigue and the incidence of adverse events during the follow-up period. A parallel process evaluation will assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention through assessment of fidelity to the programme and semi-structured interviews exploring participants’ and therapists’ experiences of the intervention. The feasibility of conducting an economic evaluation will be determined by collecting data on quality of life and resource use. Ethics and dissemination: Research Ethics Committee approval has been granted from Brunel University London. Results of the trial will be submitted for publication in journals, and distributed to people with MS and physiotherapists.
Other Identifiers: ORCID iDs: Jennifer Ryan; Jennifer Fortune; Cherry Kilbride; Nana Anokye; Christina Victor; Lorraine De Souza; Grace Lavelle; Meriel Norris
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers
Institute of Environment, Health and Societies

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf598.36 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons