Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1529
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMarsland, D-
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Digby Carter-
dc.date.accessioned2008-01-08T11:49:46Z-
dc.date.available2008-01-08T11:49:46Z-
dc.date.issued1977-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1529-
dc.descriptionThis thesis was submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy and awarded by Brunel University.-
dc.description.abstractThis thesis is concerned with some features of natural language in sociological argument and the implications of the presence of such features in such arguments for the satisfaction of the arguments. Part I describes some 'troubles' that natural language can occasion scientific methodology in research settings. It looks specifically at the damage to finality and uniqueness in questionnaire and interview interpretation. Part II describes four ways in which natural language may facilitate sociological arguments! by presentation devices; in display of author as credible; in transfer of materials in citation and in the invocation of common sense. It is suggested, then that natural language acts as a 'trouble' and a resource, the resource possibly repairing the trouble.en
dc.format.extent12934023 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBrunel University Thesesen
dc.publisherDepartment of Sociologyen
dc.relation.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/bitstream/2438/1529/4/FulltextThesis.pdf-
dc.subjectBIOSS-
dc.subjectElliott Jaques-
dc.subjectRequisite organization-
dc.subjectStratified systems-
dc.titleThe local organization of literary and rhetorical features in sociological argumentsen
dc.typeThesis-
Appears in Collections:Sociology
Dept of Social and Political Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FulltextThesis.pdf12.55 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.