Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/15304
Title: Is it cost-effective to provide internet-based interventions to complement the current provision of smoking cessation services in the Netherlands? An analysis based on the EQUIPTMOD
Authors: Cheung, KL
Wijnen, BFM
Hiligsmann, M
Coyle, K
Coyle, D
Pokhrel, S
De Vries, H
Präger, M
Evers, SMAA
Keywords: Tobacco;Model;Economic evaluation;Internet-based;Smoking cessation
Issue Date: 2017
Publisher: Wiley
Citation: Addiction, (2017)
Abstract: Background and aim: The cost-effectiveness of internet-based smoking cessation interventions is difficult to determine when they are provided as a complement to current smoking cessation services. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of such an alternate package compared with existing smoking cessation services alone (current package). Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify internet-based smoking cessation interventions in the Netherlands. A meta-analysis was then performed to determine the pooled effectiveness of a (web-based) computer-tailored intervention. The mean cost of implementing internet based interventions was calculated using available information whilst intervention reach was sourced from an English study. We used EQUIPTMOD, a Markov-based state-transition model, to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios [expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained] for different time horizons to assess the value of providing internet-based interventions to complement the current package.). Deterministic sensitivity analyses tested the uncertainty around intervention costs per smoker, relative risks, and the intervention reach. Results: Internet-based interventions had an estimated pooled relative risk of 1.40; average costs per smoker of €2.71; and a reach of 0.41% of all smokers. The alternate package (i.e. provision of internet-based intervention to the current package) was dominant (cost-saving) compared with the current package alone (0.14 QALY gained per 1000 smokers; reduced healthcare costs of €602.91 per 1000 smokers for the lifetime horizon). The alternate package remained dominant in all sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Providing internet-based smoking cessation interventions to complement the current provision of smoking cessation services could be a cost-saving policy option in the Netherlands.
URI: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/15304
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14069
ISSN: 0965-2140
Appears in Collections:Dept of Clinical Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf292.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.