Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/16356
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchutzwohl, A-
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-18T10:34:00Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-15-
dc.date.available2018-06-18T10:34:00Z-
dc.date.issued2018-06-15-
dc.identifier.citationSchutzwohl, A. (2018) 'Approach and avoidance during routine behavior and during surprise in a non-evaluative task: Surprise matters and so does the valence of the surprising event', Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 826, pp. 1-9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00826.en_US
dc.identifier.other826-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/16356-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2018 Schützwohl. The hypothesis that emotions influence our behavior via emotional action tendencies is at the core of many emotion theories. According to a strong version of this hypothesis, these emotional action tendencies are immediate, automatic (unintentional), stimulusbased and directly linked with specific muscle movements. Recent evidence, however, provides little empirical support for this strong version during routine behavior, especially when the task does not require the evaluation of the stimuli. The present study tested the prediction that surprise interrupts routine behavior and triggers a threat avoidance response. In the presence of a threat-related stimulus, avoidance responses are relatively rapid, and approach responses impeded, even when the interrupted routine behavior is guided by a non-evaluative task goal. In contrast, approach and avoidance responses are predicted to be unaffected in the presence of a pleasant surprising stimulus. To test these predictions, in each trial the participants had to execute an approach or withdrawal movement depending on the location of a target stimulus. In the critical trial, either a picture of a pleasant or a threat-related animal was presented as target. Supporting the predictions, the initiation times for these movements were shorter in response to a threat-relevant than a pleasant surprising stimulus. Additionally, in the presence of a threat-related surprising stimulus, withdrawal movements were made faster than approach movements even though the participants performed a non-evaluative task. Implications and limitations of the present study are discussed.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 9-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2018 Schützwohl. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectemotionen_US
dc.subjectsurpriseen_US
dc.subjectevolutionary psychologyen_US
dc.subjectaction tendencyen_US
dc.subjectroutine behavioren_US
dc.titleApproach and avoidance during routine behavior and during surprise in a non-evaluative task: Surprise matters and so does the valence of the surprising eventen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00826-
dc.relation.isPartOfFrontiers in Psychology-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume9-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf553.12 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons