Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/17401
Title: Popularity equilibrium: Testing a general theory of local campaign effectiveness
Authors: Fieldhouse, E
Fisher, J
Cutts, D
Keywords: campaigns;campaign effects;elections;predictive model
Issue Date: 29-Jan-2019
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Citation: Fieldhouse, E., Fisher, J. and Cutts, D. (2020) ‘Popularity equilibrium: Testing a general theory of local campaign effectiveness’, Party Politics, 26(5), pp. 529 - 542. doi: 10.1177/1354068818823443.
Abstract: © The Author(s) 2019. Parties and candidates target campaign resources where they are most likely to pay electoral dividends. At the individual level it has been shown that some individuals are more likely to be persuaded by campaign contacts than others. In a parallel tradition of measuring campaign effectiveness at the macro level, previous research has demonstrated that local candidate campaign effort measured is significantly related to electoral performance. However, while there is evidence suggestive of macro level effects, there is little systematic evidence about the district level conditions under which campaign efforts are most productive. Drawing on extensive data across six UK general elections between 1992 and 2015, we advance a theory of local campaign efficacy and test a general model of popularity equilibrium. We demonstrate that there is a curvilinear relationship between the underlying level of party support in an electoral district and the intensity of the district-level campaign – there is a ‘sweet-spot’ for maximizing the returns of campaign effort.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/17401
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818823443
ISSN: 1354-0688
Appears in Collections:Dept of Social and Political Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf484.29 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons