Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/20220
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFisher, J-
dc.contributor.authorSällberg, Y-
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-06T15:48:08Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-06T15:48:08Z-
dc.date.issued2020-03-17-
dc.identifier.citationFisher, J. and Sällberg, Y. (2020) ‘Electoral integrity – The winner takes it all? Evidence from three British general elections’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 22 (3), pp. 404 - 420. doi: 10.1177/1369148120912668.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1369-1481-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/20220-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © The Author(s) 2020. Studies of electoral integrity typically focus on electoral evaluators (expert surveys), electoral consumers (electors) and occasionally, electoral producers (electoral administrators). Using a unique new dataset collected at the British general elections of 2010, 2015 and 2017, this article examines evaluations of electoral integrity amongst a previously unresearched group of electoral users – the election agents of candidates standing for election. Using measures of both negative and positive electoral integrity, the article models explanations of users’ evaluations, focussing on agent characteristics, geography and the electoral status of the district or constituency. It shows that evaluations of electoral integrity vary significantly and highlights both that questions of electoral integrity are more localized than widespread, and that despite the significant impact of winner/loser effects, issues of electoral integrity are strongly related to the urban characteristics of an electoral district. In so doing, it makes a significant contribution to the literature on electoral integrity.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEconomic & Social Research Council (RES-000-22-2762; ES/M007251/1; ES/R005052/1); The Electoral Commission.en_US
dc.format.extent404 - 420-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publications on behalf of Political Studies Associationen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2020. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectconstituency-level analysisen_US
dc.subjectelectoral agentsen_US
dc.subjectelectoral frauden_US
dc.subjectelectoral integrity-
dc.subjectgeneral elections-
dc.subjectnegative electoral integrity-
dc.subjectpositive electoral integrity-
dc.titleElectoral integrity – The winner takes it all? Evidence from three British general electionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120912668-
dc.relation.isPartOfThe British Journal of Politics and International Relations-
pubs.issue3-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume22-
dc.identifier.eissn1467-856X-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Politics and International Relations
Dept of Social and Political Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2020. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).144.1 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons