Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/20448
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLu, FJH-
dc.contributor.authorGill, DL-
dc.contributor.authorYang, CMC-
dc.contributor.authorLee, PF-
dc.contributor.authorChiu, YH-
dc.contributor.authorHsu, YW-
dc.contributor.authorKuan, G-
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-04T09:59:56Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-06-
dc.date.available2020-03-04T09:59:56Z-
dc.date.issued2018-12-06-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Psychology, 2018, 9 (DEC)en_US
dc.identifier.issnhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02363-
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/20448-
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Lu, Gill, Yang, Lee, Chiu, Hsu and Kuan. Although considerable research indicates that mental energy is an important factor in many domains, including athletic performance (Cook and Davis, 2006), athletic mental energy (AME) has never been conceptualized and measured. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conceptualize and develop a reliable and valid instrument to assess AME. In Study 1, a focus group interview established the initial framework of AME. Study 2 used a survey to collect athletes' experiences of AME and develop a scale draft titled "Athletic Mental Energy Scale (AMES)." In Study 3, we examined the psychometric properties and the underlying structure of AMES via item analysis, internal consistency, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). In Study 4, we used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to examine AMES's factorial validity; and examined concurrent and discriminant validity by examining correlations with athletes' life stress, positive state of mind, and burnout. In study 5, we examined the measurement invariance of the 6-factor, 18-item AMES with Taiwanese and Malaysian samples. Study 6 examined the predictive validity by comparing AMES scores of successful and unsuccessful martial artists. Across these phases, results showed a 6-factor, 18-item AMES had adequate content validity, factorial structure, nomological validity, discriminant validity, predictive validity, measurement invariance, and reliability. We suggest future studies may use AMES to examine its relationships with athletes' cognition, affect, and performance. The application of AMES in sport psychology was also discussed.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the research grants from Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan, MOST 105-2410-H-034-029-MY2 and the Research University's Individual Grant (1001/PPSP/812149) from Universiti Sains Malaysia.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFrontiersen_US
dc.subjectelite athletesen_US
dc.subjectpsychology of sports excellenceen_US
dc.subjectconcentrationen_US
dc.subjectoptimal state of minden_US
dc.subjectpeak performanceen_US
dc.subjectpsychological interventionsen_US
dc.titleMeasuring athletic mental energy (AME): Instrument development and validationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02363-
dc.relation.isPartOfFrontiers in Psychology-
pubs.issueDEC-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume9-
dc.identifier.eissn1664-1078-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf619.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.