Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/20817
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMahony, C-
dc.contributor.authorAshton, RS-
dc.contributor.authorBirk, B-
dc.contributor.authorBoobis, AR-
dc.contributor.authorCull, T-
dc.contributor.authorDaston, GP-
dc.contributor.authorEwart, L-
dc.contributor.authorKnudsen, TB-
dc.contributor.authorManou, I-
dc.contributor.authorMaurer-Stroh, S-
dc.contributor.authorMargiotta-Casaluci, L-
dc.contributor.authorMüller, BP-
dc.contributor.authorNordlund, P-
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, RA-
dc.contributor.authorSteger-Hartmann, T-
dc.contributor.authorVandenbossche, E-
dc.contributor.authorViant, MR-
dc.contributor.authorVinken, M-
dc.contributor.authorWhelan, M-
dc.contributor.authorZvonimir, Z-
dc.contributor.authorCronin, MTD-
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-12T14:37:32Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-01-
dc.date.available2020-05-12T14:37:32Z-
dc.date.issued2020-04-23-
dc.identifier.citationRegulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2020, 114en_US
dc.identifier.issn0273-2300-
dc.identifier.issnhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104668-
dc.identifier.issn1096-0295-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/20817-
dc.description.abstract© 2020 The Authors The European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing (EPAA) convened a ‘Blue Sky Workshop’ on new ideas for non-animal approaches to predict repeated-dose systemic toxicity. The aim of the Workshop was to formulate strategic ideas to improve and increase the applicability, implementation and acceptance of modern non-animal methods to determine systemic toxicity. The Workshop concluded that good progress is being made to assess repeated dose toxicity without animals taking advantage of existing knowledge in toxicology, thresholds of toxicological concern, adverse outcome pathways and read-across workflows. These approaches can be supported by New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) utilising modern molecular technologies and computational methods. Recommendations from the Workshop were based around the needs for better chemical safety assessment: how to strengthen the evidence base for decision making; to develop, standardise and harmonise NAMs for human toxicity; and the improvement in the applicability and acceptance of novel techniques. “Disruptive thinking” is required to reconsider chemical legislation, validation of NAMs and the opportunities to move away from reliance on animal tests. Case study practices and data sharing, ensuring reproducibility of NAMs, were viewed as crucial to the improvement of non-animal test approaches for systemic toxicity.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipU.S.Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); Agency for Science, Technology and Research ( A*STAR), Singaporeen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElxevieren_US
dc.subjectRepeated dose toxicity testingen_US
dc.subjectAlternativesen_US
dc.subjectSafety assessmenten_US
dc.subjectChemical legislationen_US
dc.subjectin vitroen_US
dc.titleNew ideas for non-animal approaches to predict repeated-dose systemic toxicity: Report from an EPAA Blue Sky Workshopen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104668-
dc.relation.isPartOfRegulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume114-
dc.identifier.eissn1096-0295-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf742.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.