Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/21592
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNatesan, P-
dc.contributor.authorHadid, D-
dc.contributor.authorHarb, YA-
dc.contributor.authorHitti, E-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-26T00:29:54Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-13-
dc.date.available2020-09-26T00:29:54Z-
dc.date.issued2019-08-13-
dc.identifier.citationNatesan P, Hadid D, Harb YA, Hitti E (2019) Comparing patients and families perceptions of satisfaction and predictors of overall satisfaction in the emergency department. PLoS ONE 14(8): e0221087.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/21592-
dc.description.abstractStudy objective The aim of the study was to investigate factors that best predict patient’s satisfaction with their ED visit, as well as examine whether patients and their families perceived the factors related to satisfaction similarly. Methods This is a retrospective study where secondary data analysis was done on patient satisfaction data collected over three quarters for quality improvement purposes. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on the data from the first quarter to identify the factor structure, followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on the rest of the data to confirm the EFA factor structure. A structural equation model (SEM) was fitted where the factors predicted overall satisfaction with the ED visit. Finally, measurement invariance was conducted to examine if patients and families perceived the factors related to ED services alike. Results Two factors were found to be predictive of satisfaction: clinical team and system processes. The SEM showed that system process was a statistically significant predictor of overall satisfaction, while clinical team predicted overall satisfaction to a smaller extent. Multi-group CFA showed that the factor structure fitted neither family nor patient groups adequately. The instrument did not exhibit partial invariance. Conclusion This study found that system process was the best predictor of overall satisfaction. Furthermore, this study showed that the same instrument might not reliably compare the perceptions of patients and families.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 11 (11)-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.titleComparing patients and families perceptions of satisfaction and predictors of overall satisfaction in the emergency departmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221087-
dc.relation.isPartOfPLOS ONE-
pubs.issue8-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume14-
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf921.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.