Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/21982
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAbu-Raya, B-
dc.contributor.authorCoyle, D-
dc.contributor.authorBettinger, JA-
dc.contributor.authorVaudry, W-
dc.contributor.authorHalperin, SA-
dc.contributor.authorSadarangani, M-
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-09T14:07:53Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-
dc.date.available2020-12-09T14:07:53Z-
dc.date.issued2020-10-19-
dc.identifier.citationAbu-Raya, B., Coyle, D., Bettinger, J.A., Vaudry, W., Halperin, S.A., and Sadarangani, M. for members of the Canadian Immunization Monitoring Program, ACTive (IMPACT)* (2020) 'Pertussis vaccination in pregnancy in Canada: a cost-utility analysis', CMAJ Open, 2020, 8 (4), pp. E651 - E658. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200060.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2291-0026-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/21982-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The Canadian National Advisory Committee on Immunization recommends universal vaccination against pertussis in pregnancy. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of vaccination with tetanus–diphtheria–acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine in pregnancy in Canada. Methods: We conducted a cost-utility analysis comparing a vaccination program to no program corresponding with the 2017 Canadian guideline for economic evaluation from the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. We developed 2 models — part decision tree, part Markov model — to estimate the long-term cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for pregnant women and their infants. We obtained epidemiologic data from 2006 to 2015, and derived costs and utility values from relevant sources. Results were reported in 2019 Canadian dollars. We obtained expected values through probabilistic analysis, with methodologic and structural uncertainty assessed through scenario analyses. The analysis adopted an acquisition price of Tdap vaccine of $12.50, with scenario analysis conducted to identify the threshold price for vaccination to be cost-effective. Results: In the base-case scenario, for every 1000 pregnant women vaccinated, the program would lead to a gain of 0.3 QALYs, occurring solely in infants, at an increased total cost of $12 987, or $44 301 per QALY gained. Based on a threshold of $50 000 per QALY gained, vaccination would have been cost-effective in 6 of the 10 years included in the model (range of incremental costs $20 463–$100 348 per QALY gained). The threshold cost for Tdap vaccine to be cost-effective over the 10-year horizon was $14.03. Interpretation: Based on a threshold of $50 000 per QALY gained, vaccination against pertussis in pregnancy would be cost-effective if the acquisition cost per vaccine were $14.03 or less. Province- and territory-specific analyses should be done to inform local decision-making.en_US
dc.format.extentE651 - E658-
dc.languageen-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherJoule Inc.en_US
dc.rightsAuthors who publish in CMAJ Open retain copyright for noncommercial use. Single copies of articles published prior to January 1, 2021 may only be copied or shared for non-commercial educational purposes. Appropriate credits must be given. The distribution of derivative works is not permitted.-
dc.rights.urihttp://cmajopen.ca/site/misc/terms.xhtml-
dc.titlePertussis vaccination in pregnancy in Canada: a cost-utility analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200060-
dc.relation.isPartOfCMAJ Open-
pubs.issue4-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume8-
dc.identifier.eissn2291-0026-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf249.36 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.