Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22148
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Natesan Batley, P | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nandakumar, R | - |
dc.contributor.author | Palka, J | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shrestha, P | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-25T16:14:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-25T16:14:57Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-01-15 | - |
dc.identifier | ORCID iD: Prathiba Natesan Batley https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5137-792X | - |
dc.identifier | 617047 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Natesan Batley P, et al. (2021) 'Comparing the Bayesian Unknown Change-Point Model and Simulation Modeling Analysis to Analyze Single Case Experimental Designs', Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 617047, pp. 1 - 11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.617047. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1664-1078 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22148 | - |
dc.description | Data Availability Statement: The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material (https://github.com/prathiba-stat/BUCP), further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author. | - |
dc.description.abstract | Copyright © 2021 Natesan Batley, Nandakumar, Palka and Shrestha. Recently, there has been an increased interest in developing statistical methodologies for analyzing single case experimental design (SCED) data to supplement visual analysis. Some of these are simulation-driven such as Bayesian methods because Bayesian methods can compensate for small sample sizes, which is a main challenge of SCEDs. Two simulation-driven approaches: Bayesian unknown change-point model (BUCP) and simulation modeling analysis (SMA) were compared in the present study for four real datasets that exhibit “clear” immediacy, “unclear” immediacy, and delayed effects. Although SMA estimates can be used to answer some aspects of functional relationship between the independent and the outcome variables, they cannot address immediacy or provide an effect size estimate that considers autocorrelation as required by the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) Standards. BUCP overcomes these drawbacks of SMA. In final analysis, it is recommended that both visual and statistical analyses be conducted for a thorough analysis of SCEDs. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 1 - 11 | - |
dc.format.medium | Electronic | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Frontiers Media | en_US |
dc.rights | Copyright © 2021 Natesan Batley, Nandakumar, Palka and Shrestha. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. | - |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | - |
dc.subject | Bayesian | en_US |
dc.subject | Markov chain Monte Carlo | en_US |
dc.subject | single case designs | en_US |
dc.subject | simulation Modeling Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | small samples | en_US |
dc.title | Comparing the Bayesian Unknown Change-Point Model and Simulation Modeling Analysis to Analyze Single Case Experimental Designs | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Frontiers in Psychology | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
pubs.volume | 11 | - |
dc.rights.holder | Natesan Batley, Nandakumar, Palka and Shrestha | - |
Appears in Collections: | Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FullText.pdf | 1.1 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License