Brunel University Research Archive(BURA) preserves and enables easy and open access to all
types of digital content. It showcases Brunel's research outputs.
Research contained within BURA is open access, although some publications may be subject
to publisher imposed embargoes. All awarded PhD theses are also archived on BURA.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22194Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Adair, L | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lozano, N | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-06T09:55:05Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-02-06T09:55:05Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-01-03 | - |
| dc.identifier | ORCID iD: Lora Adair https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8965-3221 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Adair, L. and Lozano, N. (2022) 'Adaptive choice: Psychological perspectives on abortion and reproductive freedom', Women's Reproductive Health, 9 (1), pp. 1 - 26. doi: 10.1080/23293691.2021.1999624. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2329-3691 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22194 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | We explore abortion access, abortion experiences, and abortion stigma. We emphasize global perspectives on abortion diversity and the relationship between pregnancy norms and expectations, abortion stigma, and practical constraints on reproductive freedom. Evolutionary psychological, clinical psychological, and social-psychological perspectives illuminate how abortion decisions are shaped by strategies to optimize survival and success, support services that emphasize the costs and risks of pregnancy termination, and pronatalist norms and punishment of departures from those expectations. We call for future abortion research that integrates multiple subfields in psychology and is rooted in an intention to effect public policy and social change that promotes reproductive autonomy. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 1 - 26 | - |
| dc.format.medium | Print-Electronic | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en_US |
| dc.rights | Copyright © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Women's Reproductive Health on 03 Jan 2022, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23293691.2021.1999624. | - |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | - |
| dc.subject | abortion | en_US |
| dc.subject | stigma | en_US |
| dc.subject | reproductive justice | en_US |
| dc.subject | the motherhood mandate | en_US |
| dc.subject | pronatalism | en_US |
| dc.title | Adaptive choice: Psychological perspectives on abortion and reproductive freedom | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1080/23293691.2021.1999624 | - |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Women's Reproductive Health | - |
| pubs.issue | 1 | - |
| pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
| pubs.volume | 9 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2329-3713 | - |
| dc.rights.holder | Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FullText.pdf | Copyright © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Women's Reproductive Health on 03 Jan 2022, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23293691.2021.1999624. | 337.56 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
