Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22524
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSapara, A-
dc.contributor.authorffytche, DH-
dc.contributor.authorBirchwood, M-
dc.contributor.authorCooke, MA-
dc.contributor.authorFannon, D-
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, SCR-
dc.contributor.authorKuipers, E-
dc.contributor.authorKumari, V-
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-12T09:06:05Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-01-
dc.date.available2021-04-12T09:06:05Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationSchizophrenia Research, 2014, 152 (1), pp. 201 - 209en_US
dc.identifier.issn0920-9964-
dc.identifier.issnhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2013.11.026-
dc.identifier.issn1573-2509-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22524-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Poor insight in schizophrenia has been theorised to reflect a cognitive deficit that is secondary to brain abnormalities, localized in the brain regions that are implicated in higher order cognitive functions, including working memory (WM). This study investigated WM-related neural substrates of preserved and poor insight in schizophrenia. Method: Forty stable schizophrenia outpatients, 20 with preserved and 20 with poor insight (usable data obtained from 18 preserved and 14 poor insight patients), and 20 healthy participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during a parametric 'n-back' task. The three groups were preselected to match on age, education and predicted IQ, and the two patient groups to have distinct insight levels. Performance and fMRI data were analysed to determine how groups of patients with preserved and poor insight differed from each other, and from healthy participants. Results: Poor insight patients showed lower performance accuracy, relative to healthy participants (p. = 0.01) and preserved insight patients (p. = 0.08); the two patient groups were comparable on symptoms and medication. Preserved insight patients, relative to poor insight patients, showed greater activity most consistently in the precuneus and cerebellum (both bilateral) during WM; they also showed greater activity than healthy participants in the inferior-superior frontal gyrus and cerebellum (bilateral). Group differences in brain activity did not co-vary significantly with performance accuracy. Conclusions: The precuneus and cerebellum function contribute to preserved insight in schizophrenia. Preserved insight as well as normal-range WM capacity in schizophrenia sub-groups may be achieved via compensatory neural activity in the frontal cortex and cerebellum. © 2013 Elsevier B.V.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipWellcome Trust, UK; NIHR Birmingham and Black Country CLAHRC, UK; Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health at the Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK.en_US
dc.format.extent201 - 209-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectPsychosisen_US
dc.subjectfMRIen_US
dc.subjectWorking memory capacityen_US
dc.subjectCerebellumen_US
dc.subjectPrecuneusen_US
dc.subjectFrontal cortexen_US
dc.titlePreservation and compensation: The functional neuroanatomy of insight and working memory in schizophreniaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2013.11.026-
dc.relation.isPartOfSchizophrenia Research-
pubs.issue1-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume152-
dc.identifier.eissn1573-2509-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf834.37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.