Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22972
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNatesan Batley, P-
dc.contributor.authorContractor, A-
dc.contributor.authorWeiss, N-
dc.contributor.authorCompton, S-
dc.contributor.authorPrice, M-
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-20T11:56:50Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-20T11:56:50Z-
dc.date.issued2021-07-30-
dc.identifierORCID iDs: Prathiba Natesan Batley https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5137-792X; Ateka A. Contractor https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3032-4578.-
dc.identifier.citationNatesan Batley, P. et al. (2021) 'Psychometric evaluation of the posttrauma risky behaviors questionnaire: item response theory analyses', Assessment, 29 (8), pp 1824 - 1841. doi: 10.1177/10731911211036760.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1073-1911-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22972-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © The Author(s) 2021. The Posttrauma Risky Behaviors Questionnaire (PRBQ) assesses extent of engagement in posttrauma reckless and self-destructive behaviors (RSDBs). Given PRBQ’s recent development with limited psychometric investigations, we used Item Response Theory to examine (1) item analysis; (2) person fit; and (3) differential item functioning (DIF) across gender-based groups and two different samples. One sample included 464 participants reporting potentially traumatic experiences (Mechanical Turk [MTurk], recruited online), and the other sample included 171 trauma-exposed women reporting current intimate partner violence (IPV) and substance use (recruited in-person). All PRBQ items contributed to the RSDB scale, and all PRBQ items and the PRBQ scale provided maximum information for high levels of the RSDB latent trait. Seven and 11 items were conceptualized as low information (LI) items in the MTurk and IPV samples, respectively. Eight MTurk participants’ responses did not fit the overall pattern of responses as expected. Seven items were flagged for DIF between the two samples, and eight items were flagged for DIF between men and women in the MTurk sample. However, all effect sizes were < 8%. Conclusively, results suggest good psychometric properties for the PRBQ and support its use to compare RSDBs across different samples and gender-based groups.en_US
dc.format.extent1824 - 1841-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2021. Rights and permissions: Creative Commons License (CC BY 4.0). This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectposttrauma Risky Behaviors Questionnaireen_US
dc.subjectpsychometricsen_US
dc.subjectitem response theoryen_US
dc.subjectdifferential item functioningen_US
dc.subjectgenderen_US
dc.titlePsychometric evaluation of the posttrauma risky behaviors questionnaire: item response theory analysesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211036760-
dc.relation.isPartOfAssessment-
pubs.issue8-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume29-
dc.identifier.eissn1552-3489-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2021. Rights and permissions: Creative Commons License (CC BY 4.0). This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).713.61 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons