Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22978
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVeloso Gouveia, V-
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues Araújo, RDC-
dc.contributor.authorVasconcelos de Oliveira, IC-
dc.contributor.authorPereira Gonçalves, M-
dc.contributor.authorMilfont, T-
dc.contributor.authorLins de Holanda Coelho, G-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, W-
dc.contributor.authorde Medeiros, ED-
dc.contributor.authorSilva Soares, AK-
dc.contributor.authorPereira Monteiro, R-
dc.contributor.authorMoura de Andrade, J-
dc.contributor.authorMedeiros Cavalcanti, T-
dc.contributor.authorda Silva Nascimento, B-
dc.contributor.authorGouveia, R-
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-23T06:53:17Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-23T06:53:17Z-
dc.date.issued2021-04-29-
dc.identifierORCiD: Bruna Nascimento https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2696-9250-
dc.identifierArticle number: e1312-
dc.identifier.citationVeloso Gouveia, V. et al. (2021) 'A Short Version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI-20): Evidence on Construct Validity', Revista Interamericana De Psicología / Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 55 (1), e1312, pp. 1 - 22. doi: 10.30849/ripijp.v55i1.1312.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0034-9690-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22978-
dc.descriptionThe article is available online at: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=28474829007 .-
dc.description.abstractSeveral measures were developed in the past decades to measure personality, focusing on the Big Five Factor Model (BFFM; Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism). Despite the relevance of their findings in different countries, a shared limitation of such measures is their length, demanding time from researchers and participants, which might cause boredom or fatigue, biasing the final results. This research aimed to provide a shorter version for the 44-Item Big Five Inventory (BFI), through two studies (NTotal = 8,119). The structure was assessed using a range of techniques (e.g., PAF analysis, Procrustes rotation). The best 20 items (4 per factor) were chosen to compose the final version of the BFI-20, which presented suitable psychometric evidences across the samples. Thus, due the growing need for shorter measures without losing their psychometric quality, our findings indicate the adequacy of the 20-item BFI and its potential applicability in research context.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 22-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherInteramerican Society of Psychologyen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.source.urihttps://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=28474829007-
dc.titleA short version of the big five inventory (Bfi-20): Evidence on construct validityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2021-02-19-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.30849/ripijp.v55i1.1312-
dc.relation.isPartOfInteramerican Journal of Psychology-
pubs.issue1-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume55-
dc.identifier.eissn2329-4795-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2021 The Author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). [https://www.redalyc.org/redalyc/media/normas/normcol284.html].1.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons