Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22978
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVeloso Gouveia, V-
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues Araújo, RDC-
dc.contributor.authorVasconcelos de Oliveira, IC-
dc.contributor.authorPereira Gonçalves, M-
dc.contributor.authorMilfont, T-
dc.contributor.authorLins de Holanda Coelho, G-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, W-
dc.contributor.authorde Medeiros, ED-
dc.contributor.authorSilva Soares, AK-
dc.contributor.authorPereira Monteiro, R-
dc.contributor.authorMoura de Andrade, J-
dc.contributor.authorMedeiros Cavalcanti, T-
dc.contributor.authorda Silva Nascimento, B-
dc.contributor.authorGouveia, R-
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-23T06:53:17Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-23T06:53:17Z-
dc.date.issued2021-04-29-
dc.identifier.citationVeloso Gouveia, V., de Carvalho Rodrigues Araújo, R., Vasconcelos de Oliveira, I. C., Pereira Gonçalves, M., Milfont, T., Lins de Holanda Coelho, G., Santos, W., de Medeiros, E. D., Silva Soares, A. K., Pereira Monteiro, R., Moura de Andrade, J., Medeiros Cavalcanti, T., da Silva Nascimento, B., and Gouveia, R. (2021) 'A Short Version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI-20): Evidence on Construct Validity', Revista Interamericana De Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 55 (1), e1312, pp. 1 - 22. doi: 10.30849/ripijp.v55i1.1312.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0034-9690-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22978-
dc.description.abstractSeveral measures were developed in the past decades to measure personality, focusing on the Big Five Factor Model (BFFM; Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism). Despite the relevance of their findings in different countries, a shared limitation of such measures is their length, demanding time from researchers and participants, which might cause boredom or fatigue, biasing the final results. This research aimed to provide a shorter version for the 44-Item Big Five Inventory (BFI), through two studies (NTotal = 8,119). The structure was assessed using a range of techniques (e.g., PAF analysis, Procrustes rotation). The best 20 items (4 per factor) were chosen to compose the final version of the BFI-20, which presented suitable psychometric evidences across the samples. Thus, due the growing need for shorter measures without losing their psychometric quality, our findings indicate the adequacy of the 20-item BFI and its potential applicability in research context.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 22 (22)-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherInteramerican Society of Psychologyen_US
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/-
dc.titleA short version of the big five inventory (Bfi-20): Evidence on construct validityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.30849/ripijp.v55i1.1312-
dc.relation.isPartOfInteramerican Journal of Psychology-
pubs.issue1-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume55-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf1.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons