Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/23567
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMurray, E-
dc.contributor.authorBennetts, R-
dc.contributor.authorTree, J-
dc.contributor.authorBate, S-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-20T18:50:17Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-20T18:50:17Z-
dc.date.issued2021-12-16-
dc.identifierORCiD: Rachel Bennetts https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3543-9836-
dc.identifier.citationMurray, E. et al. (2021) 'An Update of the Benton Facial Recognition Test', Behavior Research Methods, 54 (5), pp. 2318 - 2333. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01727-x.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1554-351X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/23567-
dc.descriptionOpen Practices Statement: None of the experiments were pre-registered. The data are available as supplementary material. The BFRT-r stimuli and dataset are available via the Open Science Framework, and can be accessed here: https://osf.io/vza3m/?view_only=404f6d1971924759b126d46cba1d25b7en_US
dc.descriptionPart of an integrated thesis.-
dc.description.abstractThe Benton Facial Recognition Test (BFRT) is a paper-and-pen task that is traditionally used to assess face perception skills in neurological, clinical and psychiatric conditions. Despite criticisms of its stimuli, the task enjoys a simple procedure and is rapid to administer. Further, it has recently been computerised (BFRT-c), allowing reliable measurement of completion times and the need for online testing. Here, in response to calls for repeat screening for the accurate detection of face processing deficits, we present the BFRT-Revised (BFRT-r): a new version of the BFRT-c that maintains the task’s basic paradigm, but employs new, higher-quality stimuli that reflect recent theoretical advances in the field. An initial validation study with typical participants indicated that the BFRT-r has good internal reliability and content validity. A second investigation indicated that while younger and older participants had comparable accuracy, completion times were longer in the latter, highlighting the need for age-matched norms. Administration of the BFRT-r and BFRT-c to 32 individuals with developmental prosopagnosia resulted in improved sensitivity in diagnostic screening for the BFRT-r compared to the BFRT-c. These findings are discussed in relation to current diagnostic screening protocols for face perception deficits. The BFRT-r is stored in an open repository and is freely available to other researchers.-
dc.description.sponsorshipSarah Bate is supported by a British Academy Mid-Career Fellowship (MD170004) and a Leverhulme Research Fellowship (RF-2020-105).-
dc.format.extent2318 - 2333-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Nature on behalf of The Psychonomic Society, Inc.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2021. This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01727-x (see: https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/journal-policies).-
dc.rights.urihttps://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/journal-policies-
dc.subjectface perceptionen_US
dc.subjectface matchingen_US
dc.subjectface recognitionen_US
dc.subjectprosopagnosiaen_US
dc.subjectBenton response timesen_US
dc.titleAn Update of the Benton Facial Recognition Testen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2021-10-13-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01727-x-
dc.relation.isPartOfBehavior Research Methods-
pubs.issue5-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume54-
dc.identifier.eissn1554-3528-
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-10-13-
dc.rights.holderThe Psychonomic Society, Inc.-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2021. This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01727-x (see: https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/journal-policies).1.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.