Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/23795
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNolan, CM-
dc.contributor.authorPatel, S-
dc.contributor.authorBarker, RE-
dc.contributor.authorWalsh, JA-
dc.contributor.authorPolgar, O-
dc.contributor.authorMaddocks, M-
dc.contributor.authorGeorge, PM-
dc.contributor.authorRenzoni, EA-
dc.contributor.authorWells, AU-
dc.contributor.authorMolyneaux, PL-
dc.contributor.authorKouranos, V-
dc.contributor.authorChua, F-
dc.contributor.authorMaher, TM-
dc.contributor.authorMan, WDC-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-21T13:50:23Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-02-
dc.date.available2021-12-21T13:50:23Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifiere048808-
dc.identifier.citationNolan CM, Patel S, Barker RE, et alMuscle stimulation in advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a randomised placebo-controlled feasibility studyBMJ Open 2021;11:e048808. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048808en_US
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/23795-
dc.description.abstractObjectives To assess the acceptability of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) of the quadriceps muscles in people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and to identify whether a future definitive trial is feasible. Design A randomised, parallel, two-group, participant and assessor-blinded, placebo-controlled feasibility trial with embedded qualitative interviews. Setting Outpatient department, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals. Participants Twenty-two people with IPF: median (25th, 75th centiles) age 76 (74, 82) years, forced vital capacity 62 (50, 75) % predicted, 6min walk test distance 289 (149, 360) m. Interventions Usual care (home-based exercise, weekly telephone support, breathlessness management leaflet) with either placebo or active NMES for 6weeks, with follow-up at 6 and 12 weeks. Primary outcome measures Feasibility of recruitment and retention, treatment uptake and adherence, outcome assessments, participant and outcome assessor blinding and adverse events related to interventions. Secondary outcome measures Outcome measures with potential to be primary or secondary outcomes in a definitive clinical trial. In addition, purposively sampled participants were interviewed to capture their experiences and acceptability of the trial. Results Out of 364 people screened, 23 were recruited: 11 were allocated to each group and one was withdrawn prior to randomisation. Compared with the control group, a greater proportion of the intervention group completed the intervention, remained in the trial blinded to group allocation and experienced intervention-related adverse events. Assessor blinding was maintained. The secondary outcome measures were feasible with most missing data associated with the accelerometer. Small participant numbers precluded identification of an outcome measure suitable for a definitive trial. Qualitative findings demonstrated that trial process and active NMES were acceptable but there were concerns about the credibility of placebo NMES. Conclusions Primarily owing to recruitment difficulties, a definitive trial using the current protocol to evaluate NMES in people with IPF is not feasible. Trial registration number NCT03499275.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipBritish Lung Foundation IPF Project Grant (grant number IPF/PG/17-15)en_US
dc.languageen-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/-
dc.titleMuscle stimulation in advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A randomised placebo-controlled feasibility studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048808-
dc.relation.isPartOfBMJ Open-
pubs.issue6-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume11-
dc.identifier.eissn2044-6055-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf895.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons