Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24082
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorde Dios, R-
dc.contributor.authorSantero, E-
dc.contributor.authorReyes‐Ramírez, F-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-08T13:01:37Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-08T13:01:37Z-
dc.date.issued2022-01-20-
dc.identifier.citationde Dios, R., Santero, E. and Reyes‐Ramírez, F. (2022) 'The functional differences between paralogous regulators define the control of the general stress response in Sphingopyxis granuli  TFA', Environmental Microbiology, 0 (in press), pp. 1-14. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15907.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1462-2912-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24082-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2022 The Authors. Sphingopyxis granuli TFA is a contaminant degrading alphaproteobacterium that responds to adverse conditions by inducing the general stress response (GSR), an adaptive response that controls the transcription of a variety of genes to overcome adverse conditions. The core GSR regulators (the response regulator PhyR, the anti-σ factor NepR and the σ factor EcfG) are duplicated in TFA, being PhyR1 and PhyR2, NepR1 and NepR2 and EcfG1 and EcfG2. Based on multiple genetic, phenotypical and biochemical evidences including in vitro transcription assays, we have assigned distinct functional features to each paralogue and assessed their contribution to the GSR regulation, dictating its timing and the intensity. We show that different stress signals are differentially integrated into the GSR by PhyR1 and PhyR2, therefore producing different levels of GSR activation. We demonstrate in vitro that both NepR1 and NepR2 bind EcfG1 and EcfG2, although NepR1 produces a more stable interaction than NepR2. Conversely, NepR2 interacts with phosphorylated PhyR1 and PhyR2 more efficiently than NepR1. We propose an integrative model where NepR2 would play a dual negative role: it would directly inhibit the σ factors upon activation of the GSR and it would modulate the GSR activity indirectly by titrating the PhyR regulators.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMinisterio de Educación y Ciencia. Grant Number: FPU15/04789; Spanish Ministry for Education and Science and the European Regional Development Fund. Grant Number: BIO2014-57545-R.en_US
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageen-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Son on behalf of Society for Applied Microbiologyen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2022 The Authors. Environmental Microbiology published by Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.titleThe functional differences between paralogous regulators define the control of the general stress response in Sphingopyxis granuli  TFAen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15907-
dc.relation.isPartOfEnvironmental Microbiology-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.eissn1462-2920-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf2.27 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons