Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24605
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTurpin, HD-
dc.contributor.authorWillard, AK-
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-19T16:45:18Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-19T16:45:18Z-
dc.date.issued2022-05-25-
dc.identifiere20-
dc.identifier.citationTurpin, H.D. and Willard, A.K. (2022) 'Credibility Enhancing Displays, religious scandal and the decline of Irish Catholic orthodoxy', Evolutionary Human Sciences, 4, e20, pp. 1 - 19. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2022.21.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24605-
dc.descriptionResearch Transparency and Reproducibility: Data and analysis code are available in an Open Science Framework repository at: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/M3XPHen_US
dc.descriptionSocial media summary: High estimates of clerical paedophilia predict the rejection of orthodox tenets of belief among Irish individuals who have been baptised Catholic, but only low levels of religious signalling from parents predict leaving Catholicism entirely and rejecting theism in general.-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © The Author(s), 2022. Credibility Enhancing Displays have been shown to be an important component in the transmission of empirically unverifiable cultural content such as religious beliefs. Decreased Credibility Enhancing Displays are a major predictor of religious decline. However, because declines in belief are often paired with decreasing importance of religious institutions, existing research has not yet shown the effect of Credibility Enhancing Displays as separate from this institutional decline. Here, we assess the role of past Credibility Enhancing Display exposure among the baptised Catholic population of Ireland in predicting who retains a Catholic identity and religious beliefs among those who reject the Catholic Church. We find that leaving Catholicism outright (i.e. ‘Ex-Catholicism’) is predicted by low Credibility Enhancing Display exposure, but rejecting the Church while retaining a Catholic identity (i.e. ‘Liminal Catholicism’) and theistic belief is not. High perceived prevalence of clerical paedophiles (i.e., religious hypocrisy) predicts both groups similarly. Higher exposure to Credibility Enhancing Displays predicts higher orthodox Catholic beliefs and Catholic morality among Catholics, but with inconsistent and even negative effects among the other groups. High perceived prevalence of clerical paedophiles predicts the rejection of orthodox Catholic beliefs, but not the rejection of theism or a Catholic identity.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFinancial Support: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 19-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.titleCredibility Enhancing Displays, religious scandal and the decline of Irish Catholic orthodoxyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2022.21-
dc.relation.isPartOfEvolutionary Human Sciences-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume0-
dc.identifier.eissn2513-843X-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.425.3 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons