Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25364
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAcerbi, A-
dc.contributor.authorSacco, PL-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-25T10:10:18Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-25T10:10:18Z-
dc.date.issued2022-10-12-
dc.identifier.citationAcerbi, A. and Sacco, P.L. (2022) 'The self-control vs. self-indulgence dilemma: A culturomic analysis of 20th century trends', Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 101, 101946, pp. 1 - 9. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2022.101946.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2214-8043-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25364-
dc.descriptionData availability statement: The data analyzed in the current study are from the publicly accessible English Google Books online repository, https://books.google.com/ngrams.en_US
dc.descriptionThis is a pre-copyedited preprint made available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License at OSF Preprints (https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/xgqt5). It has not been certified by peer review.-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2021 The Authors. Within the conceptual framework of the Tightness-Looseness (TL) paradigm, we study the dynamics of the social salience of self-control (tight) vs-self-indulgence (loose) orientations across the 20th century on the basis of the English Google Books corpus, by means of the construction of specific lexica of which we track their relative frequency. We find that whereas the trend of self-control displays a steady increase throughout, that of self-restraint is U-shaped, so that following a decline along the most part of the century, starting from the late 70s-early 80s we observe a reversal of the trend that signals an increasing salience of self-control. Such result seems to reflect the consumerist turn that has characterized the post-industrial cycle from the 80s onwards. The coexistence of growing trends for mutually antagonizing orientations calls for further analysis of their social interplay. We also perform a parallel analysis on semantically related lexica that confirm the robustness of our findings.-
dc.description.sponsorshipNo funding was received for conducting this study.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/xgqt5-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2021 The Authors. This is a pre-copyedited preprint made available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License at OSF Preprints (https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/xgqt5). It has not been certified by peer review.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectself-controlen_US
dc.subjectself-indulgenceen_US
dc.subjecttightness-loosenessen_US
dc.subjectculturomicsen_US
dc.subjectconsumerismen_US
dc.titleThe self-control vs. self-indulgence dilemma: A culturomic analysis of 20th century trendsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/xgqt5-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.eissn2214-8051-
dc.rights.holderThe Authors-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf1.32 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons