Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25458
Title: | Establishing open science research priorities in health psychology: a research prioritisation Delphi exercise |
Authors: | Norris, E Prescott, A Noone, C Green, JA Reynolds, J Grant, SP Toomey, E |
Keywords: | open science;Delphi study;research prioritisation;health psychology;meta-research |
Issue Date: | 31-Oct-2022 |
Publisher: | Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group) |
Citation: | Norris, E. et al. (2022) 'Establishing open science research priorities in health psychology: a research prioritisation Delphi exercise', Psychology and Health: an international journal, 0 (ahead of print), pp. 1 - 25. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2022.2139830. |
Abstract: | Objective: Research on Open Science practices in Health Psychology is lacking. This meta-research study aimed to identify research question priorities and obtain consensus on the Top 5 prioritised research questions for Open Science in Health Psychology. Methods and measures: An international Delphi consensus study was conducted. Twenty-three experts in Open Science and Health Psychology within the European Health Psychology Society (EHPS) suggested research question priorities to create a ‘long-list’ of items (Phase 1). Forty-three EHPS members rated the importance of these items, ranked their top five and suggested their own additional items (Phase 2). Twenty-four EHPS members received feedback on Phase 2 responses and then re-rated and re-ranked their top five research questions (Phase 3). Results: The top five ranked research question priorities were: 1. ‘To what extent are Open Science behaviours currently practised in Health Psychology?’, 2. ‘How can we maximise the usefulness of Open Data and Open Code resources?’, 3. ‘How can Open Data be increased within Health Psychology?’, 4. ‘What interventions are effective for increasing the adoption of Open Science in Health Psychology?’ and 5. ‘How can we increase free Open Access publishing in Health Psychology?’. Conclusion: Funding and resources should prioritise the research questions identified here. |
Description: | Data availability statement:
All data from this study is available here: https://osf.io/suhez/ Materials availability statement: All materials from this study are available here: https://osf.io/am8jq/ |
URI: | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25458 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2022.2139830 |
ISSN: | 0887-0446 |
Other Identifiers: | ORCiD ID: Emma Norris: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9957-4025 ORCID iD: Chris Noone: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4974-9066 ORCID iD: James A. Green: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7309-0751 ORCID iD: James Reynolds: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1536-1557 ORCID iD: Sean Patrick Grant: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7775-3022 ORCID iD: Elaine Toomey: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5941-0838 |
Appears in Collections: | Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FullText.pdf | Copyright © 2022 the author(s). Published by Informa UK limited, trading as taylor & Francis Group.his is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | 1.98 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License