Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25489
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNaysmith, LF-
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, SCR-
dc.contributor.authorKumari, V-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-11T10:50:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-11T10:50:00Z-
dc.date.issued2022-10-21-
dc.identifierORCiD IDs: Laura F Naysmith https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2064-4060; Veena Kumari https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9635-5505.-
dc.identifier.citationNaysmith, L.F., Williams, S.C.R. and Kumari, V. (2022) 'The influence of stimulus onset asynchrony, task order, sex and hormonal contraception on prepulse inhibition and prepulse facilitation: Methodological considerations for drug and imaging research', Journal of Psychopharmacology, 36 (11), pp. 1234 - 1242. doi: 10.1177/02698811221133469.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0269-8811-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25489-
dc.descriptionData availability statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author [LN], upon reasonable request.en_US
dc.descriptionFootnotes: Rights retention strategy: For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising.-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © The Author(s) 2022. Background: Prepulse-induced startle modulation occurs when a weak sensory stimulus (‘prepulse’) is presented before a startling sensory stimulus (‘pulse’), producing an inhibited (Prepulse Inhibition, PPI) or facilitated (Prepulse Facilitation, PPF) startle response. We recently identified several gaps and outlined future lines of enquiry to enable a fuller understanding of the neurobiology of PPI and PPF in healthy and clinical populations. However, before embarking on these studies, it is important to consider how task and population characteristics affect these phenomena in healthy humans. Methods: We examined PPI and PPF in separate tasks, with counterbalanced task order across participants in one session, using a range of stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs), in 48 healthy adults (23 men, 25 women; 10 hormonal contraceptive users) to determine which SOAs produce the strongest PPI and PPF and also explored how sex and hormonal contraception might influence PPI and PPF under these experimental conditions. Results: Both PPI and PPF were affected by SOA, with greatest PPI observed at 60 and 120 ms, and greatest PPF at 4500 and 6000 ms. PPI was influenced by sex (more PPI in men than women) and hormonal contraception, whereas PPF was affected by task order (greater PPF when the PPF task followed, rather than preceded, the PPI task). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that studies of PPI and PPF need to consider, not only sex and hormonal status of study participants, but also task characteristics and presentation order to reduce variance and increase replicability across studies.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipLido CTP Unilever; Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC).en_US
dc.format.extent1234 - 1242-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsRights and permissions: Copyright © The Author(s) 2022. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectstartle reflexen_US
dc.subjectprepulse paradigmen_US
dc.subjectprepulse inhibitionen_US
dc.subjectprepulse facilitationen_US
dc.subjectneuropsychopharmacologyen_US
dc.titleThe influence of stimulus onset asynchrony, task order, sex and hormonal contraception on prepulse inhibition and prepulse facilitation: Methodological considerations for drug and imaging researchen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/02698811221133469-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Psychopharmacology-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
dc.identifier.eissn1461-7285-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfRights and permissions: Copyright © The Author(s) 2022. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).995.77 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons